We all see that video game culture is being subverted to push a far left ideology. Activists insert their bizarre politics into games and reviews so brazenly and angrily that it is hard to ignore. Most of these radicals don’t even play video games—it’s just a way for them to preach.
But many get enticed by their ideology because they speak of fairness and empowerment. Shouldn’t more be done to help girls get acess to the gaming industry, after all? Why do men act so threatened by equality? Because that’s not their goal. We need to be able to show people that their images of fairness and empowerment are just illusions, conjured by SJWs to mask their true ideology, which is something far more sinister.
Position Not Determined By Achievement
I thought it was odd when Brianna Wu gloated about the fact that she got her start from a $200,000 gift from her wealthy parents. It seems like all SJWs come from plush, entitled backgrounds yet say they care about disenfranchised people, the poor and downtrodden. So why would Brianna put that out there like it is something to be proud of?
Well, have we ever stopped to think that maybe their plush backgrounds are the reason they feel entitled to dictate how things ought to be? And maybe the fact that they are un-talented and unappreciated is what makes them feel downtrodden?
Attacks on meritocracy is vital to the SJW movement. Meritocracy is the belief that position and wealth should result from a person’s achievement, rather than by their position of birth or status. Look closely, and you will see that SJWs detest any notion that they should have to prove themselves with hard work and talented achievements.
Anita states on her donation page that her goal is to “encourage critical media literacy and provide resources for media makers to improve their works of fiction.” Well, we all would like to see improved works of fiction, but what does Anita mean by “critical media literacy” and how does she think it will improve fiction?
Critical media literacy has been used since the 1960’s to push socialist beliefs. It teaches that “corporate media produce illusory images that conceal the structural dimensions of class while perpetuating dominant myths of meritocracy.” Read that again: corporate media—as opposed to government propaganda—produce false notions of social class structure. Media should portray a different kind of class structure. Futhermore, media should destroy the myth of meritocracy.
Tom Johnson of the University of Arizona’s student paper gets it. He says:
The core of this ill-treatment seems to spin from the influence of the Protestant Work Ethic in the U.S.: the belief that a person’s worth is determined by if and how much they can work and produce. According to this idea, if an autistic person can’t work as much as others or is perceived as unwilling to work, then they are lazy and deserve whatever they get. Our nation’s “pick yourself up by your bootstraps” mentality can be used to discriminate against those who work or communicate differently from the majority….
If we want to eliminate disability discrimination, we must first change our attitudes about work and how work determines one’s worth. We must leave behind the notion that if you are inefficient, you are worthless under our system and should not receive accommodation or the monetary support necessary to survive.
Does video game culture unfairly marginalize people with our expectations? Tom Johnson, a white male, points to certain social classes that should a priori be propped up higher than the rest of us. This is the new kind of social class structure that critical media literacy has in mind. Johnson writes:
And hell, let’s have those who are really being marginalized by #GamerGate have their voices as a banner flag in the medium. Let’s put the viewpoints of women, people of color and LGBTQ and intersex people on the stand, both as commentators and makers of games, to break up the discrimination the medium has gone through over the years.
Illusions Of Victimization
In order to prop up the new social class structure, and prop up themselves as the elite leaders, the SJWs need to make minorities look disenfranchized, victims of the old system. Joseph Stalin sent his goons to kill off the Kulaks, farmers who achieved wealth through hard work. Chairman Mao sent his youth gang to kill off doctors, teachers, and anyone else who achieve high rank through education and work. These are the “dominant ideologies” that CML wants to revive.
If you are someone who achieved rank through hard work, or just a descendant of someone who did, that makes you a bigot, an oppressor. It is your fault women don’t care to go into engineering. You must be one of those harassers we read about on MSNBC and ABC News.
Critical Media Literacy was started by the United Nations, under the American group UNESCO. For many decades, the government group pumped this ideology into children’s brains, quitely and efficiently. CML literature teaches children how to bring “critical consciousness in people who have been oppressed,” so that the children would “serve as agents of social change.” As they get older, these children are expected to use the media to bring about change, to join “social groups that are able to gain access to media” and make the society more “inclusive.” This is why SJWs gravitate to journalism schools. It is their pulpit.
For all of their lives, these privileged, elitist children were taught about “media violence, gender and racial stereotypes, the sexualization of children, and concerns about loss of privacy, cyberbullying and Internet predators” caused by the old social system. It is plain as day to the rest of us that nobody is being oppressed by video games, that women and minorities never had it so well as now. But SJWs see prejudice and victimization anywhere they can. Whatever it takes to justify their purge of media.
Weathered feminists like Christina Sommers can see that feminism is being exploited. But the up and coming generation does not understand this. Feminism, gay rights, liberalism, and everything else is a vehicle to change, and they will be discarded once the change is wrought.
The end goal for CML is the destruction of capitalism, which should come as no surprise considering CML was created by a global government group. CML teaches children that it is wrong for media to be “produced and distributed by groups of people often for commercial profit.” Change in the media is ” ‘globalization from below’ that fosters progressive social agendas, emancipation and radical democratic participation as a means to overcome authoritarianism and corporate power.” Globalization is brought about if they reverse “corporate influence within the public sphere.”
Corporate media’s narrow, unrealistic images conceal the extent of this assault on America’s workforce, so we can no longer afford to ignore TV’s framing of the working class or see it as just entertainment.
Wait, hold on Rick, this is crazy. Why would corporations like Intel promote these people?
Intel saw from the beginning what this was all about. That’s why they were one of the first to side with GamerGate. But the pressure became too immense. The SJWs have such a stranglehold on the media, such considerable cultural influence, that corporations must either comply and die tomorrow, or resist and die today. The bottom line for corporations is income, and compliance with the socialist agenda is simply more profitable. They have no allegiance to meritocracy and democracy.
Fight SJWs Where It Hurts
This expose should give you ammunition to fight for GamerGate. Dispel the illusion of fairness and equality. Point out the social stratification and aristocracy that they create. Don’t just dabble at the surface–their hypocrisy, hatred and ugly attacks–dig straight into what they are really about–elitism and social justice. Their ideology has failed time and time again.
You really expect me to believe your wacky conspiracy theories?
Sure, it is a stretch to connect Anita Sarkeesian to a UN globalist group. There is no need to go spreading around theories. Anita does make the CML ideology her stated goal, and symptoms can be seen in the writings of SJWs across the landscape. Whether or not it is her intention, she serves toward the socialist goal.
The best way to fight the SJWs is with calm, polite discussion, one-on-one. Treat social justice as a religion, because that’s what it is. You are facing up against religious extremists who hate you because you are not part of their religion.
I was a religious missionary in Europe myself so I could give some insight on what it is like. I found it was better to talk to people one on one, politely, rather than screaming from a soap box. One day, a group of us were proselytizing in a square when a Protestant church group drove up, set up speakers, and blared ear-splitting Christian rock music to drown us out. A small crowd gathered to see what they were about, and I resented that they quickly got so much attention. But then I thought, maybe people are as annoyed by the obnoxious music as I was. And loud Christianized rock music is not a strong way to teach religious messages anyway.
It is the same for Vox Media and NBC. In-your-face propaganda annoys most people (just look at the user ratings for the Law & Order episode and the ABC News video), and those who are convinced are not strongly converted.
SJWs are coming after gaming because it is a growing form of media, and they already control television, print, and to a large extent, the internet. It is a powerful medium that can instill messages and beliefs more subtly than ever before. But in the end, media is always flawed, and nothing convinces people more than sincere, intelligent one-on-one discussion.
By their fruits ye shall know them. Just look at the hatred, division, and wackiness that SJWs produce. Look at the people they produce. You know just from the impression they create that they are no good. And you don’t need to be a dedicated blogger to counter their agenda. Convince people through your example. Talk about it at school, at work, wherever. Explain why you are on GamerGate’s side, know your crap, and be the kind of positive, uplifting person that they want to side with.