Welcome To Reaxxion A gaming site for those who support #gamergate

Roosh Valizadeh

Roosh is publisher of Reaxxion. He created it to provide a space for masculine men who play video games. You can follow him on Twitter.

November 10, 2014 484 Comments Meta

Hello, my name is Roosh. For the past 15 years I have published writing that has helped Western men meet women, travel the world, and achieve their self-improvement goals. In 2001, a blog I started after graduating from college received 300 page views a day. Today, the sites I run receive over 225,000 views a day, reaching over one million people per month.

I have written well over one million words, but less than 2,000 of those have been taken out of context to paint me as an extremist, misogynist, and rapist, accusations that my friends, family, and women I’ve had relationships with can’t understand. I must state that I have never once committed assault against a woman or been accused of assault, but like I’ve written before in What Is A Social Justice Warrior?, such accusations are being used as weapons to marginalize speech.

Today, people who support #gamergate, a revolt against corrupt gaming journalism sites, are being labeled as extremist and misogynist by the same media outlets and organizations (e.g. SPLC) that have labeled me in the past. They have experienced firsthand, just like I did, what happens when you seek truth, a value that is opposed by those who subscribe to the far-left narrative.

They have experienced firsthand, just like I have, how the mainstream media enables or coordinates with SJW’s who actively and openly participate in harassment, threatening behavior, and even SWATing, which can result in death.

They have experienced firsthand, just like I have, how their message can be shut down and censored by the media even though it is based on fact. The awakening that people supporting #gamergate are currently experiencing is something that men in my sphere have been dealing with for years.

I’m not a gamer

I’m starting a video game site even though I haven’t played video games seriously since the year 2000 (Starcraft was my jam). I don’t even play mobile games. I won’t blow smoke up your ass by pretending I’m a gamer or have a deep commitment in furthering game technology. My only commitment is with helping men.

I aim to protect the interests of heterosexual Western males, a category I’m in. The far-left is trying to censor and criminalize masculine behaviors that are normal. They want to relabel consensual sex as “rape” and relabel innocent flirting as “harassment,” and as I learned with #gamergate, they’ve successfully infected the gaming industry and gaming journalist sites by damaging the very nature of gaming development to fit their extreme political agenda. So while I don’t play video games, the idea of starting a pro-#gamergate site is compatible with my overall mission.

My younger brother, who considers himself a gamer, gave me the definitive push into starting Reaxxion. He plays Xbox, PC games on Steam, and also some mobile games. He particularly likes games with long and intricate story lines, telling me that gaming is just not about pushing buttons to advance a level but to be affected on some level by a compelling story, but now those stories are being perverted by people who truly believe that men are evil and holding women down just because they may want to enjoy a traditional story line with attractive women.

The infiltration of SJW’s into gaming may mean that my brother will have to put up with their narrative in his games. It may mean that his entertainment options become more limited because a developer was subtly threatened unless he inserted another “empowered female” in a game where such a character simply doesn’t fit. I’ve learned that unless you fight back against these people, unless you spread awareness and develop a megaphone as big as them, they will surely get what they want and impact the culture in a way that hurts normal men who don’t subscribe to their strange worldview.

Have you heard of Return Of Kings?

I also run Return Of Kings, a site that has been labeled as horrible by the same media outlets who are against #gamergate. They have singled out less than 10 articles out of 1,825 as proof the site is an incubator of hate and a den of trolls. This simply isn’t true. While we have posted some controversial articles (such as this one that recently received nearly 35,000 comments), we strongly believe in two things:

Men should be masculine and women should be feminine
Criticism of women is not misogyny—it’s simply trying to make them the best versions of themselves

I will be the first to admit, however, that ROK is “hardcore” stuff in that we don’t sugarcoat or offer “trigger warnings” to protect those who need to be shielded from reality, but if you don’t agree with ROK, that’s fine, because Reaxxion will not try to jam ideology down your throat like the existing gaming sites. We won’t tell you to go to the gym and live in Eastern Europe to sleep with thin women, behaviors that I currently engage in. If one day you want to browse through the ideas of traditional masculinity, you know where to go, but if you don’t care about that stuff, that’s fine too. It’s your choice, and we won’t criticize you for it.

Reaxxion’s goal

Our goal is simple: create a safe space for heterosexual males who play video games. We won’t exclude homosexuals or attractive women from commenting on our articles, and we sincerely hope they find value in what we have to say, but understand that this site will be written by male gamers for male gamers. It aims to be a place where men can be themselves without SJW infiltration, judgement, and influence. In the year 2014, surprisingly, there are very few spaces for men online where their message isn’t attacked by white knights, man-haters, and SJW’s. I know an unmet need when I see one.

In the upcoming weeks, you will see articles from men who enjoy playing video games and who believe games should be evaluated on merit, not ideology. But we can’t do this alone. We’re not going to speak down at you from an ivory tower. We’re not going to brainwash you into thinking exactly like us or force you to live exactly like us. Instead, we want you to send your input. What kind of gaming site do you want? What are the existing gaming sites not providing? Even better, send us your submissions. We want you to inject your DNA, your ideas, and your stories into Reaxxion. Instead of trying to silence you like the other sites, we want to make your voice louder, even if you are not a “professional journalist.”

I have no grand plan for Reaxxion. The direction of the site will be determined by the team of writers I’ve assembled and the submissions you send us. My main job is to present the articles in an appealing format, keep out SJW’s who are hellbent on destroying instead of creating, and publish articles that its authors believe in. The second you see articles trying to troll you is the second you must call me out on it.

Until we get rolling, I urge you to visit our ethics page, which aims to address the main concerns that started #gamergate in the first place, and also our about page, where you can read our community beliefs.

We are the reaction to #gamergate

For better or worse, #gamergate has forever destroyed the innocence of gaming in that there will always be a cloud of politics floating above it, but I speak for the entire team in that we hope the reaction to such a random and spontaneous event will ultimately bring men together to better enjoy the hobby that brings value to their lives. As long as I’m alive, I will do all that I can to make sure men can just be men.

Don’t Miss An Article: Follow Us On Twitter

Nov 10, 2014Roosh Valizadeh

More From Reaxxion

Roosh_V

Test comment!
- sdfgh
  
  Roosh please, please create a section within this website dedicated to media, that is, TV shows and movies wherein we can share every bit of female glorification and male denigration for the world to see.
  
  In addition, a section dedicated to take down SJWs in day-to-day life, in actuality and not just net, would be wonderful.
  
  But that section for the TV shows and movies, that is a must. Please Roosh give it a thought and do the needful.
  
  And thank you very much for your work.
  - Roosh_V
    
    I will consider this, though initially we will not have the manpower to cover so broad a topic range.
    - sdfgh
      
      Thank you for considering it. Once it gets started, things will hopefully fall into place.
      
      Thank you.
MarkSNES

Works alright.
http://www.conqueringyourlife.com/ Remy Sheppard

Glad to see you stepping up and doing this. I feel like this will be a huge turning point in the whole #GamerGate battle.
- Devin L. Ganger
  
  Yup. If #GamerGate doesn’t disassociate themselves from this guy quickly, the whole “it’s not about misogyny” argument will fall even further apart than it already has.
  - JC
    
    Hopefully this site will enlighten millions of young men, and free their minds of the toxic cultural marxism that has been taking The Long March Through the Institutions over the past 60 years. Lotta work to do.
    - Social Justice Dwarf Rogue
      
      To the Fedora Mobile! Your evil plan to Treat Women With Respect Rather Than As Objects Of Sexual Conquest is no match for….. The Doucheman!
      
      Take that, Poorly Defined Social Justice Marxist Caricature Of Doom!
      
      **wanks all alone in ’97 Acura**
      
      **cries**
      
      **goes home to a Hot Pocket and trusty sidekick Mr Sniffles The Wonder Dog That Is Trained To Bark At Leftists**
      - Fopdespotic
        
        You forgot your spork.
    - NotActuallyHere
      
      Fucking Poe’s law.
      - JC
        
        Just because you aren’t capable or educated on the topic, doesn’t mean others aren’t. SJW and third wave feminists, unbeknownst to them, are Trotsky-ite tools.
    - Vanir
      
      Back to the dark ages. Just with games. Yay!
      
      Interesting that some people will look at the worst parts of human history and essentially say, “this, right here, this dehumanization and discrimination.. we need to do that again!”
      - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
        
        Politically correct censorship is a brutal and ancient practice. It’s the free expression of “offensive” viewpoints that is a new luxury for humanity. I’d rather SJWs not regress us to speech-policing and elite-approved content for the masses.
      - Vanir
        
        this claim to modernity would have more weight if those who hate SJWs weren’t usually trying to regress us back to ape-stage with their free expressions
        
        men strong, women weak
        men rule, women do what men say
        ook ook ook
        
        seriously, no one has silenced this BS through most of history. only recent *real* civilization challenges this evil
      - Fopdespotic
        
        Most of history has had gender roles that were most efficient and beneficial for complementary sexes.
        
        All of recorded history has been created by patriarchal societies.
        
        All of your society and most of everything in it has been created by men.
        
        How is that stone age logic, as you’re implying? Feminism is a modern invention borne through privilege. Men have continually granted more and more rights to women despite not needing to or benefiting from it.
        
        The destruction of gender roles, it is believed by some (including me), is not beneficial to anyone. I am the first to say that everyone should have equal opportunity and access to resources for self improvement. I also believe there are innate differences in the sexes that lead to different aptitudes and interests. I believe that different sexual strategies evolved from this and that society, in many ways, is a mechanism to limit the destructiveness of these sexual strategies, and gender roles play an integral part in this. I believe these sexual strategies have an inverse relationship: if one is strong in a society, the other is weak. I think that feminists and women are using legislation to make society more favorable to their sexual strategy, and that means that it will come at men’s detriment. Societies that are femme-centric tend to wither and die, and therefore I am against much of feminist doctrine.
      - Vanir
        
        from its very beginning – you assume since trad gender roles are good for men, they are good for women. that what is good for the big strong man, is good in general. simply not true – if they were, men would not have to basically force women to accept these roles (directly or indirectly)
        women knows what’s best for themselves, and that’s not to be reduced to men’s obedient, dependent little wifeys. it’s to live strong and free, sovereign in their own lives.
      - Fopdespotic
        
        Traditional gender roles are SHIT for men. You don’t know what you’re talking about. We have to sacrifice our lives in supporting a family, be it with years of intensive physical labor, stressful jobs, or putting ourselves in danger in order for them to survive.
        
        Society forced both men and women to temper their ultimate sexual strategies in pursuit of mutual gain.
        
        Fucking unbelievable piece of solipsistic logic displayed in this post.
      - Vanir
        
        so you need to hold a job? how horrible. not like you would need that regardless… pretty sure most women also work to support themselves and their family nowadays, and guess what? it’s a BETTER DEAL than being completely
        dependent on a man’s goodwill. careers are not horrible. working is not a curse. it gives means and freedom.
        
        simply put; the trad male role is absolutely preferable to the trad female role.
        it is a GOOD role to be in. it’s a position of means, pride and control, it’s not being held dependent on someone as their servant girl and babymaker
      - Fopdespotic
        
        You realize most people hate their job, right? And you realize that, in the past, people didn’t have cushy office jobs, right? And you also realize that the majority of dangerous and risk-filled positions have always and continue to be held by primarily men, correct?
        
        You’re right though, having an arm mangled in machinery or your body permanently damaged from manual labor is much preferable to keeping a house orderly and tending to children.
        
        How about the fact that women in conservative households with a traditional family are consistently found to be the happiest in America. I’m sure you knew that one. Oh, what about the other end of that spectrum, where childless single women are continually measured to be the least happy and most dissatisfied. Or the fact that, with every decade of increasing amounts of roles outside of the house, women have gotten progressively less and less happy, to the point where 1/4 of them are on some type of anti-depressant?
        
        Man you got me! Women are so much better when they take on more masculine roles.
        
        Your arguments are devoid of logic and continue to be amazingly solipsistic. This is the last time I’ll respond to you.
      - Vanir
        
        you might not respond, but i’ll still answer you.
        
        the job may suck. but not having a job, and having to be dependent on and subservient to someone who HAS a job, would suck more. also, you telling me women who are okay with playing second fiddle in their own life find trad marriage fine? gee – what a shock. and of course it’s harder for women who don’t want trad roles – society is still stacked against them!
      - Caploxion
        
        @disqus_5Qh8WSMyYs:disqus “simply put; the trad male role is absolutely preferable to the trad female role.”
        
        Men were drafted into bloody, brutal battles; women were not. Men were required to gather their own wealth, or else likely starve on the streets; women simply had to get married. Men were expected to go down with the ship; women were expected to be off first. Men are not allowed to hit women (although, this one varies depending on the time); women can hit men, often without recourse for serious strikes (especially nowadays). [Attractive] Women often receive freebies and positive attention by beta men; men, regardless of their physical beauty, almost never receive freebies. Women’s actions, at some stages in the past, were entirely the fault of the husband; men were never granted anything like this.
        
        You are either ignorant of history or completely insane. Traditional Conservatism and Feminism are gynocentrism but in different forms.
      - Travis
        
        “Forced” women to accept these roles. By refusing to feed and protect them out of the good of their hearts? Obviously you don’t know what’s best for yourselves, or you wouldn’t be on here telling us how great it would have been if men had just left you to fend for yourselves. And you only get to live strong and free, sovereign in your own lives” if you have the taxes of men to provide a social safety net for you, an army of men to protect you from foreign invaders, a largely male police force to protect you from people who would wish to do you harm, a largely male fire department to put out the fires in your homes, and a whole army of guys who do all the crap jobs that keep this country running, which women have shown absolutely no interest in doing. The idea that you consider yourself strong, free, and “sovereign in your own life” is beyond funny.
      - Vanir
        
        again, you assume women needed protection and feeding in the natural state – which is simply wrong.
        
        women can take care of themselves, and it is men who have kept them out of the military and “protective” roles – something that is now changing, thankfully. so in the future YOU’LL increasingly owe your safety and liberty to women, as well as to other men.
        
        as for crap jobs. women don’t do them because they don’t end up in them, so to speak.
        one is free to aim for the job one wants or don’t want. nothing is owed to people for doing
        certain jobs, they chose it themselves (as much as anyone chose)
      - Travis
        
        “again, you assume women needed protection and feeding in the natural state – which is simply wrong.”
        
        Of course. A woman who is eight months pregnant is just as capable of fighting off invaders and stalking and killing game as any man. How silly of me. I find it funny that (again) an upper middle class white girl such as yourself who has probably never done a day of physical labor in her life is so certain about all of this. Hate to break it to you, princess. But real life isn’t a video game or one of those “empowering” movies. And no, it’s NOT wrong. If women could protect and feed themselves, how did men ever get their “feet on women’s necks” in the first place? Surely you could have fought us off? Again, you prove beyond all shadow of a doubt that I’m dealing with a complete imbecile.
        
        “women can take care of themselves, and it is men who have kept them out of the military and “protective” roles – something that is now changing, thankfully”
        
        Yep. Because that oppressive patriarchy actually insisted that, before a woman could be placed into a position where other’s lives could depend on her, she should actually be able to pass certain physical standards. Ohhh. Those evil men. At it again. But thankfully, thanks to the efforts of women like yourself, women are no longer as oppressed by things like “standards”, or whether or not she’s actually qualified to do the job. Political correctness again trumps truth and common sense. Another victory for the feminists!
        
        “so in the future YOU’LL increasingly owe your safety and liberty to women, as well as to other men.”
        
        Awesome! So does that mean that I can thank them for their sacrifice the same way that you’ve thanked men for theirs? By denigrating them, spitting on them, and treating them like pieces of shit?
        
        By the way, I’d also point out that all of this remains to be seen. So far, all we have is your prediction that women will sign up for this shit en masse. And you also completely sidestepped my point. Which is that you are, at the current time, COMPLETELY dependent on men for the quality of life you enjoy. Easy to talk about how strong and independent you are when someone else is doing all the heavy lifting so that you don’t have to.
        
        “as for crap jobs. women don’t do them because they don’t end up in them, so to speak. one is free to aim for the job one wants or don’t want. nothing is owed to people for doing certain jobs, they chose it themselves (as much as anyone chose)”
        
        And again. Completely sidestepped the fact that YOU depend on those guys toiling away in those shit jobs that you and other women refuse to do. Not quite as strong and independent as you’d like to have us believe.
      - Vanir
        
        you do realize women can also rely on each other, right?
        the pregnant ones watch the kiddies at home, while the others gather and such.
        pretty much how it worked. how it STILL works in “primitive” societies
        
        and yes. physically men are stronger and faster. you are the only thing women actually are really in danger from.
        your male ancestors could oppress women for their own benefit, so they did. how is this a point in your favor? since dawn of “civilization”, men have “protected” their subjugated women – from other men who would use them exactly as they themselves would. essentially, men’s been fighting over who gets to possess the breeding-stock – little else.
        
        modern women who fight to protect your rights and freedom (using firearms and such that equalize men’s size advantage) – actually DO protect YOUR rights as well as the rights of other women, so it’s *objectively* different from your forefathers who fought only for their/your rights and liberties
        
        and if women had to do shit-jobs, they would. why is the fact that women chose away certain jobs, when they can, somehow indicative of lacking independence?
      - Travis
        
        “you do realize women can also rely on each other, right?
        the pregnant ones watch the kiddies at home, while the others gather and such.
        pretty much how it worked. how it STILL works in “primitive” societies”
        
        And strangely, all of those societies have REMAINED primitive, while the patriarchal societies you seem to hate so much have advanced. Which has benefited both you AND me. Unless, of course, you’d be happier living in a hut in Africa.
        
        “and yes. physically men are stronger and faster. you are the only thing women actually are really in danger from.”
        
        Yes. We are. And the only thing that kept you from becoming “breeding stock” for other groups of men were your male ancestors who provided your poor, oppressed female ancestors with protection. And only a privileged idiot from the city would actually claim that, in the wild, MEN are the only thing that women would need protection from. I have a feeling that you wouldn’t last two days out in the woods.
        
        “your male ancestors could oppress women for their own benefit, so they did”
        
        They’re YOUR ancestors too, you fucking idiot. And without them, you wouldn’t be here. Let alone live such a comfortable, pampered life where your biggest worry is whether or not overweight, depressed, obnoxious women are equally represented in the video games you play.
        
        And again, it wasn’t for THEIR benefit. AGAIN you show a complete inability to grasp any concept that hasn’t been spoonfed to you by your gender studies teacher. Men and women BOTH benefited from traditional gender roles. Which is why societies that had them came to dominate the world, while women from the societies you used as examples are still living in grass huts, have no running water, and have to worry about some dude with a machete popping in, raping them, and then chopping off one (or more) of their limbs.
        
        “modern women who fight to protect your rights and freedom (using firearms and such that equalize men’s size advantage) – actually DO
        protect YOUR rights as well as the rights of other women, so it’s *objectively* different from your forefathers who fought only for their/your rights and liberties”
        
        Again. Only a pampered little girl who has no idea about the world outside her own little protected existence would claim that firearms equalize men and women for combat roles or to serve in the police force. By your logic, I guess we could start signing up fourteen year olds to be navy seals. As long as we give them a gun, they’d be just as effective, right?
        
        “and if women had to do shit-jobs, they would. why is the fact that women chose away certain jobs, when they can, somehow indicative of lacking independence?”
        
        Of course they would. And if I had to swim across the English Channel, I would too. Pretty simple to say, as long as I know I’m never going to have to put my money where my mouth is. And it’s indicative of lacking independence because YOU DEPEND ON THOSE MEN to provide you with the lifestyle you enjoy. It’s the very definition of dependence. If tomorrow, men and women were segregated into completely separate societies, the only real difference for us as far as quality of life goes would be that we’d spend more time jerking off. The quality of life for women, on the other hand, would completely plummet.
        
        I’m usually not a big fan of internet memes, but I ran across one the other day which seems to sum up your attitude perfectly…
      - Vanir
        
        primitive and free? or advanced and subjugated? if it really came down to it, i would like to think i’d pick the former.
        
        in the wild there are other dangerous elements. but even large predators can (and are) dealt with. you think tribal women don’t walk around? if they were insta-killed the moment something dangerous came along, they would not be effective at gathering. which they are (in pure calories, gathering is more important than hunting for the typical tribal groups survival).
        
        and you missed my point. historically, it hasn’t MATTERED which group of men win the head-bashing contest. the women would remain subjugated breeding stock regardless who won. “the others” would use them for the same thing “their own” already was using them for. neither would be any more liberating or oppressive than the other.
        
        your estimate of women’s ability to take care of themselves “on their own” is rather abysmal. seeing as you are dead-set on your views that women are pathetic and wouldn’t cope if they HAD to do the kind of jobs now largely done by men. however i’ve never claimed those men *oppress* women by doing those jobs… honestly it seems more like you think women are oppressing men by electing away jobs men chose to do anyway.
      - Travis
        
        “primitive and free? or advanced and subjugated? if it really came down to it, i would like to think i’d pick the former.”
        
        And I think it’s pretty obvious that you’re full of shit. Who’s stopping you? Feel free to flee the oppressive white man and go live in Africa. But we both know that you won’t do that. And if you did, I doubt you’d last more than a couple of weeks before you’d be heading back to your nice, “oppressive” society full of air conditioning, starbucks lattes, video games, and legions of men willing to work hard to provide you with all the little comforts and amenities that you seem to take for granted.
        
        “in the wild there are other dangerous elements. but even large predators can (and are) dealt with.”
        
        By whom? You? You seem to think that if men would have just left women alone at the dawn of humanity, everything would have just been sunshine and rose petals, and women would have lived in this Garden of Eden fairytale that you’ve constructed in your mind. Unlike you, I’ve spent a good amount of time out in the wilderness, and even with modern things like guns, protective insulated clothing, matches, etc, the average person wouldn’t last more than a couple of weeks at most.
        
        “It takes a village”. And unlike you, I believe men needed women as well. We survived because we worked together. This idea that men just wanted to subjugate and oppress women is complete and utter bullshit. Just like today, most men would have (and many times did) fought and died to protect the women they loved. Your view of reality and the relationship between the sexes is so unbelievably warped and perverted that I’m having a hard time believing that this isn’t just some elaborate troll.
        
        The irony is that it’s people like YOU who are creating the very misogyny that you hate so much. You tell us that we’re evil. That we only want to rape and oppress women. And then you act shocked and indignant when men find that offensive, and tell you to go fuck yourself.
        
        “and you missed my point. historically, it hasn’t MATTERED which group of men win the head-bashing contest. the women would remain subjugated breeding stock regardless who won. “the others” would use them for the same thing “their own” already was using them for. neither would be any more liberating or oppressive than the other.”
        
        And yet again you show your complete lack of any sort of historical knowledge. If you think that all societies treated women equally horribly, then maybe you need to actually do some research before you spout off on something you know absolutely nothing about. Hell. Women in the West had it a hell of a lot better 200 years ago than women in most parts of the world still have it today. Nobody was surgically removing women’s clitoris in the west. Still happening today in Africa. No one was stoning women for adultery or forcing them to walk around covered from head to toe. Still happening in the Middle East. And yet you still spend all your time bitching about white men in the west “oppressing” you because they don’t want to play the videogames that YOU WANT them to play, while giving those men a free pass, because you don’t want to sound racist. You people are a joke. Maybe you should try being grateful for all that you have, and for the fact that us “evil white males” don’t treat you the same way that most of the other men in the world treat women. By the way, can you give me some examples of all this “oppression” that you have to deal with? I mean real, concrete, verifiable examples of ways women are discriminated against or disadvantaged here in the west. Not “guys don’t take us seriously”. Can you offer any actual PROOF that you’re being oppressed, other than quotes from Tumblr feminists TELLING you that you’re being oppressed?
        
        “your estimate of women’s ability to take care of themselves “on their own” is rather abysmal. seeing as you are dead-set on your views that women are pathetic and wouldn’t cope if they HAD to do the kind of jobs now largely done by men. however i’ve never claimed those men *oppress* women by doing those jobs… honestly it seems more like you think women”are oppressing men by electing away jobs men chose to do anyway.”
        
        I never said women couldn’t cope. Eventually I’m sure you’d figure out how to do those jobs. I’m just saying that your standards of living would drop DRAMATICALLY without men around to do all the shit jobs that keep you in the style you’re accustomed to. Again, the picture I posted is the perfect example of the attitude you seem to have. I hate to break it to you, but life is rough all over. It ain’t fair. And I don’t believe for a second that you’d be willing to trade your upper middle class, white girl life for the one’s that 99.9 percent of the men who have ever lived have had to lead. The difference is, you seem to think that you’re entitled to whine and bitch about every single little trivial inconvenience you have to face, and blame it on those “evil white men”, instead of recognizing that EVERYBODY has shit they have to deal with. And most of it is a hell of a lot worse than any problems you’ve probably had to face. Or I’VE had to face for that matter. The difference between you and me is that I’m actually grateful for how lucky I am, and all you seem to be able to do is complain about how rough you’ve got it, and crap all over the people who made your privileged existence possible.
      - Vanir
        
        leave? nah, i’d rather work to end what remains of the old oppressive ways. the jungle may be preferable to slavery, but freedom AND lattes are even better than that 😀
        
        men and women may have worked together at “dawn of humanity” – but that ended the moment men decided to rule women rather than rule with them. we’re just now getting back to cooperation rather than exploitation – but we’ve had to drag (some) men there kicking and screaming all the way.
        
        seriously, history from ca. 10 000 BC to very recent is really just the tale of my foremothers being trodden on by men who also fought each other for power, and for possession of my foremothers. for women, most of it is irrelevant, except the few points of light in history where women had influence. why care about the “accomplishments” reached by misogynist men, when their legacies and deeds were made possible by keeping my
        foremothers pregnant and barefoot?
        
        the descendants of slaves do not care about the monuments raised by the slave-masters.
        
        i recognize it would be difficult for city girls to survive a more primitive life (yet, still a better option than being men’s breeding-cows and servants). but for woman grown and raised for it, not so much a problem (you DO realize there ARE women who still live as gatherers in “primitive” societies, dealing with dangerous jungles and men without getting eaten or raped).
        
        again you keep focusing on non-western societies. sorry, but them being sociopath misogynists do not lower the bar for you.
        
        uh. yes. everyone has stuff to deal with. always have i wouldn’t trade MY life for that of a 18th century man but i WOULD take it over the life of a 18th century WOMAN
        
        and i do recognize the people women owe their freedom to. it’s just that those people aren’t my forefathers, but my foremothers – who challenged my forefathers for that freedom (but i have already covered this). to them i am eternally grateful. to the ones THEY had to TAKE their freedom from? not so much. you expect gratefulness to the ones who stole women’s freedom, because at some point women managed to make them to give it back?
      - ephena
        
        lol. Don’t need to find the stone-age logic. Plenty of western, dudebro, modern logic to go round. The first computer programing was written by a woman – Ada Lovelace. The technology that allows for wifi was partially invented by a woman – Hedy Lamarr. Radiation, the discovery that allows for xray, and nuclear power, and cancer treatment, came from a woman – Marie Curie. Kevlar was invented by a woman – Stephanie Kwolek.
        
        Also, oddly enough, countries in which gender inequality in terms of education and economic control was reduced, had greater increases in economic growth, reductions in infant mortality and morbidity, and many other indicators of social and economic improvement. (Millennium Development Goals). Sweden is hardly withering away and dying.
        
        I know you don’t care. Reality is not your strong suit. There is a whole sub set of men who have been hoodwinked into thinking that any loss of control means they are going to die. Women sharing power are no threat to self-confident, well-adjusted men. If you find yourself fearing a world where women control their lives the way men assume they should be able to control their own, you might need to look at what that says about you.
      - Fopdespotic
        
        Your emotions are clouding your mind. Please reread my comment and try and comprehend without a kneejerk reaction.
        
        Token examples really do nothing but disprove your point, man. I never even implied that women are incapable of making discoveries, what my argument was that gender roles are based on what gives the greatest good to the greatest number of people. We wouldn’t have developed them if it didn’t. Yes, there are some genius women, but there is, will be, and always has been more genius men than women who will make more progress.
        
        And these societies that have greater gender equality tend to be advanced nations. It’s not exactly fair to equate Sweden to a country in South America. And if you don’t think Sweden is withering and dying, look at the birth rates, and then look at the number of immigrants coming into the country, and then despair. And if you notice places like Denmark have a majority of women are working part-time in comparison to the men in order to take better care of their families, which is frustrating many feminists.
        
        And then you just kind of devolve into attacking me based on assumptions you made in your cognitive dissonance. Nice.
      - Anti-Citizen
        
        “Radiation, the discovery that allows for xray, and nuclear power, and cancer treatment, came from a woman – Marie Curie.”
        
        Not only you cannot express yourself coherently (as shown by this statement), you are also scientifically illiterate. Maybe it is not your fault but the school system that places more emphasis on “fairness”, diversity, social justice and other feel-good idiocies instead of academic excellence.
        
        Radiation is the propagation of electromagnetic waves a.k.a. light and this was proven by Heinrich Hertz. X-rays were discovered by Wilhelm Röntgen. What Curie contributed was the study of radioactive decay and two radioactive elements (polonium and radium). Impressive discoveries, but you are a moron.
      - ephena
        
        Lol. I made one mistake. In my hast I got one out of four attributions wrong. I was only partially right. Clearly that wipes out everything I have done in my life up to this point. I’ll give back my degrees on Monday.
        
        GG suckered in a bunch of unhappy boys by appealing to their sense of gall that there are women in their clubhouse. A bald faced lie about sex for favours matched up so well with what you all wanted to be true that critical thinking didn’t even get out of bed. Every bro that posted some wild claim was swallowed whole. Now you are so entrenched that to admit any error is more than any of you can bear.
        
        I made a mistake in sleep deprivation and illness. My fuck up. I can laugh at myself for doing that. People who can’t admit they were wrong or who can’t incorporate new information are more wrong than someone who screws up but realizes what they’ve done.
      - Anti-Citizen
        
        “‘ll give back my degrees on Monday.”Women’s Studies degree?
      - ephena
        
        That would be so awesome for you, wouldn’t it? It would confirm everything you want to believe about me. Nope. Not women’s studies.
      - Travis
        
        You mean the “real” civilization that wouldn’t even exist if it weren’t for patriarchy and the evil white males that you seem to despise so much? If men and women truly are equal, then why didn’t women form their own society long ago where they wouldn’t have to be burdened by us horrible males?
        
        And I find it hilarious that you use the term “free expressions” like it’s a bad thing. Really gives us an insight into the SJW mindset.
      - Vanir
        
        not “burdened by us horrible males” – kinda suggest society WITHOUT men. for obvious reasons such a society would not survive past one generation… though we might be getting to the point of that being possible… in a hundred years time, or so.
        and “real” civilization is the one we have gotten the last Century or so. in part because of female influence. before that it was just men co-operating to screw everyone else over for their own benefit (keep men on top, women pregnant in kitchen, non-whites as second class, etc). it was an ordered gang of thugs set on power for themselves at the expense of everyone else. not much more
      - Travis
        
        “and “real” civilization is the one we have gotten the last Century or so. in part because of female influence.”
        
        So in your mind, these civilizations just magically sprung into being? Hate to break it to you, but that’s not how it works. Take the U.S. for instance. Men created a society where women could be safe and secure. They built a society strong enough to protect it’s people from other countries which might want to conquer it. They built a society where you wouldn’t have to spent 14 hours a day out working in a field (like large parts of the rest of the world). And once they had built that safe, prosperous society, women demanded the right to be equal partners in running it. Which is fine. I’m not trying to deny you your right to vote or anything else. But a little reality check would be nice. The only reason you live such a pampered, privileged life is because of the men who created this society you seem to take for granted so much.
        
        And the irony of someone so obviously racist and sexist lecturing others about their racism and sexism is not lost on me. You’re spoiled little ass wouldn’t be sitting there in your nice air conditioned apartment typing this right now if it wasn’t for a bunch of guys sacrificing their lives in order to earn you that privilege. And the only thanks you give is to sit there and shit all over them. I find people like yourself every bit as disgusting and nauseating as you find people like me. I assure you.
      - Vanir
        
        men created these “civilizations” for their own benefit. it was nothing more than a club for boys to protect their mutual interests- not until women *took* their right to vote and made it their civilization as well. then it became something more. it became *actual* civilization – where the goal was to *stop* people from exploiting others and keep them down – not to make oneself more *efficient* at doing so.
      - Travis
        
        You can’t actually believe the crap that comes out of your mouth. It’s like talking to some bizarre, Orwellian caricature who has spent her entire life encapsulated in a feminist bubble, and has gained the ability to block out all reality and history which doesn’t conform to the warped, fantasy worldview that she’s been programmed with. Women didn’t “take” anything. I hate to break it to you, but if men hadn’t decided to allow it, you still wouldn’t have the right to vote. Ironic. The very men you hate and denigrate so much are the same men who ALLOW you to take an equal part in society. Or are you saying that the women in Muslim and African countries just aren’t as brave as you upper middle class white girls who “fought” for your rights?
        And if the white men who made you one of the most pampered, spoiled, and over privileged human beings to ever walk the planet hadn’t been so “efficient” at “exploiting others and keeping them down”, there’s a 99.9 percent chance that you would be living under the rule of the noble Africans, Asians, or Middle Easterners. Tell you what. If the oppressive white man is so horrible, maybe you should move over to one of those countries where the men are much more “tolerant” and “non-oppressive”. No one is stopping you.
      - Vanir
        
        women were free to begin with. that is the natural state. being subjugated by men is not. you didn’t give women anything, you simply had to relinquish the control you had taken by force. and yes, i am aware that men in other cultures also keep their women down – that their civilization are *still* boys club where a big focus is organized exploitation and oppression of women.
        
        but how is this an excuse for *our* history?
        
        i am focused on western male oppression of women because i live in the west. yes, africans, asians, islamists, whatever, may keep women down, but it was western man who had their boot on the neck of MY foremothers. and it is western men who want women back under their boot, that concerns me the most.
        
        outsiders try. we fight, we die or we win – but we won’t be slaves again. with you, it’s more complicated.
      - Travis
        
        Yep. And women were free to die cold and hungry when they got pregnant because there weren’t any men to go out and kill a mastodon to feed them, or to protect them from other men who would happily rape and kill them. There was a social contract. And women benefited JUST as much from it as men. More.
        
        It’s hilarious that privileged, upper class white girls like yourself think of yourselves as “oppressed outsiders”, while at the same time trashing and shitting on your forefathers who sacrificed so much so that you could be the pampered little snowflake that you are. You suckle up all the benefits and protections of the society they created, and then turn around and crap on those that bequeathed those privileges to you. You’re an ungrateful, spoiled little brat who has been given the world, and in return can do nothing but stomp your feet and demand more. It’s pathetic. And it’s embarrassing
        
        Take a good look, all you white knights. This is who you’re defending. A racist and a sexist who classifies you as an evil oppressor based on the fact that you have a penis, and the color of your skin. Careful, Vanir. Your mask is slipping.
      - Vanir
        
        if you think women in pre-historic societies were dependent on men to feed them, you are deluded. women in tribal societies often bring in MORE calories than the men. gathering + hunting small game or fishing is efficient, more so than going after big game. you’ll also find that women can start fires, and usually are the ones piecing together the clothes, anyway… so cold will not be more of a problem
        
        as for rape? kind of belittling your own gender there, aren’t you? natural state of men is to be walking rape machines? i actually disagree. you think less of men than i do, it seems. and still, if man tries. having more muscle would not save him from a knife between the ribs.
        
        also. you seem to take this almost personally. i don not blame PAST sins on todays men (only todays sins). and historically men fought to improve their own position, freedom, privilege, whatever… women had to take it on their own – from the men who still kept women down after they had improved their own lot. so what exactly is owed? take the war of independence – it was hard and bloody – true, but women mainly did not benefit – men did. in other words; our forefathers did not fight for women, they fought for themselves, for *you*. my foremothers had to confront THEM to get their liberty. THEY fought for women. and to them women SHOULD be grateful. i am VERY aware that freedom for women came at a price, but i am also aware WHO paid that price. and WHO they had to challenge.
        
        you may owe your freedom and liberty to your forefathers, women, however, owe it to their foremothers who challenged those forefathers for it.
        
        racist? sexist? nice try. i have already stated i don’t consider white men “worse” objectively speaking. they are just the ones MY foremothers were held down by. hence i focus on them. and sexist? with the rape example above, i think i’m less sexist against men than YOU are 😀
  - Kirijo
    
    Yeah, cause SJW/Leftists totally argue on good faith. Boy, are you naive.
  - Thomas Fährmann
    
    fuck you. I dont care about misogyny and i know more then gaming and actual content creation then you. I´m a level designer and i love ROK! I also think feminists suck and that man should slap wymin in the face when they are out of control. I cant stand your messed up progressive mindset that is so pussyfied it´s pure faggotry!
  - 1stworlder
    
    With feminists willing to put out for good reviews (as seen in gamergate) you need a leader that isn’t desperate
    - ephena
      
      oh dear. you buy that, don’t you? You got taken for a ride by a jilted ex.
      - 1stworlder
        
        You see game developers might be willing to go for sloppy 25ths with Zoe Quinn, but Roosh would pass on being the 25th guy in that feminist cause de jure of the woman who cried rape after blowing 24 guys in a bar on video winning a nasty girl contest with a prize of a $7 drink.
  - Travis
    
    Yeah. Because when women talk about what they want to see in games, it should be championed. Because it’s enlightened and progressive. But when guys have an opinion on what games they would like to play, it’s evil misogyny and women hating. In other words, women should get to have an opinion, but men shouldn’t. You SJW’s should really stop now. Or else the whole “It’s about equality” argument will fall even further apart than it already has.
    - ephena
      
      You really are pretty sad. When women talk about what they want to see in games, it is as consumers. As has been pointed out to me multiple times in gg, games are designed for men – under the assumption that men are the ones that play them. So, 95% of what you see in games is made for you. Men’s opinions are the basis of 95% of game design. Women are asking that they be represented as they make up 48% of the paying customers. So, men lose some of their monopoly, and freak the fuck out. In their flailing they do some very stupid shit and get called on it. Men are not being called evil and misogynistic for having an opinion on what they would like to see in games, a bunch of them are being called evil and misogynistic for spewing violent hatred at women who express opinions about what they would like to see. It’s a bit of a distinction, and I guess it would be asking a lot to get you to make they huge intellectual leap that is the difference between having and expressing an opinion and wishing violent rape with a power tool on another person for expressing theirs.
      - Travis
        
        “You really are pretty sad.”
        
        Funny, that’s exactly the way I view perpetual victims such as yourself who feel the need to trumpet what “strong, independent women” they are, while at the same time asking men to protect them from hurtful words on the internet.
        
        “When women talk about what they want to see in games, it is as consumers.”
        
        Yeah, yeah. I get it. And when men do it, it’s as evil, oppressive enforcers of the patriarchy.
        
        “So, 95% of what you see in games is made for you. Men’s opinions are the basis of 95% of game design.”
        
        And, as we’ve seen in every other industry which has folded to SJW demands, you won’t be satisfied until 100% of games have been pre-approved by people like yourself to make sure they don’t contain any thought crime.
        
        “Women are asking that they be represented as they make up 48% of the paying customers.”
        
        Utter bullshit. And you know it. But then, I don’t really expect much else from the same people who continue to trumpet complete falsehoods such as the wage gap and the 1 in 4 rape statistic. Sorry, but the credibility of feminists and social justice warriors and their manufactured studies just ain’t what it used to be. If you really did make up 48% of the paying customers, then wouldn’t you think that 48% of the games would be designed and marketed towards women? Why aren’t more women designing and marketing the games they’d like to see? If you’re correct, there’s a huge market out there that no one is filling, right? Let me guess. The companies that make games don’t care about profit. It’s all about oppressing the poor women.
        
        Here’s the thing. If the market was there for the product you want, companies would be making those games. But it isn’t. So instead of letting the market do it’s thing, you feminists do what you always do, and try to force your way in and browbeat companies into doing what it is you want them to do anyway.
        
        “Men are not being called evil and misogynistic for having an opinion on what they would like to see in games, a bunch of them are being called evil and misogynistic for spewing violent hatred at women who express opinions about what they would like to see.”
        
        I beg to differ. This site was explicitly designed TO GET AWAY FROM YOU. The people here aren’t “spewing violent hatred at women who express opinions about what they would like to see”. If we had it our way, you wouldn’t even be here. But here you are, following US to a site where we just want to talk about OUR opinion regarding games and what WE’D like to see, and spewing violent hatred at us. Can you not see the irony of your statement? We’re perfectly content to leave you alone. But you obviously aren’t content to do the same.
        
        “and I guess it would be asking a lot to get you to make they huge intellectual leap that is the difference between having and expressing an opinion and wishing violent rape with a power tool on another person for expressing theirs.”
        
        Yeah. Just like it would be asking a whole lot of you to make an argument without trying to use one statement that someone might or might not have said somewhere else and apply it to everyone here. Again. WE DON’T WANT YOU HERE. You know that. So if you don’t want to hear people calling you names, why don’t you just GO THE FUCK ELSEWHERE? It’d be like me following some guy around everywhere he goes, punching him in the back of the head. And when he finally gets sick of it and turns around and punches me back, I cry and whine and tell everyone what a big jerk he is.
      - ephena
        
        1. Not a victim. Not sure where you are getting that from.
        
        2. 48%. ESA. You can quibble with definitions, but the truth of the matter is that’s where the money is coming from – which is why game development companies are actually paying some sort of attention to women complaining about content. “Here’s the thing. If the market was there for the product you want, companies would be making those games. But it isn’t.” Women are currently asking, and the industry is slowly starting to pay attention. You think Ubisoft gives a flying fuck about oppression? Nope. They retreated when they saw their bottom line threatened.
        
        3. 1 in 4. Actually 1 in 5 for rape (CDC, 2011) 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men experience intimate partner sexual violence. For things less than rape, the stats are much higher. I don’t actually know any adult women who have not experienced some form of sexual violence or harassment.
        
        4. Irony. Right. This site claims to be about gamergate – ethics in journalism! ! But it took less than a day to be all about Girls need to shut up so we can talk about games. This is about losing absolute control of the conversation, and losing influence with game design because there are women’s considerable dollars making an impact.
        
        5. Following you around. Sucks, eh?
      - Travis
        
        “1. Not a victim. Not sure where you are getting that from.”
        
        You can’t be serious. This statement is so fucking ridiculous that I don’t really even know how to respond. Self awareness isn’t your strong suit, is it?
        
        “2. 48%. ESA. You can quibble with definitions, but the truth of the matter is that’s where the money is coming from – which is why game development companies are actually paying some sort of attention to women complaining about content. “Here’s the thing. If the market was there for the product you want, companies would be making those games.
        But it isn’t.” Women are currently asking, and the industry is slowly starting to pay attention. You think Ubisoft gives a flying fuck about oppression? Nope. They retreated when they saw their bottom line threatened.”
        
        No. The truth of the matter is that the money is NOT coming from women. Let’s go ahead and quibble with those definitions. The 48% number, from what I understand, includes those phone app games like Candy Crush and Angry Birds. Anyone who would seriously argue that women make up 48% of the gaming population is completely out of touch with reality, and is not to be taken seriously. All you have to do is visit a gaming site, or play some Xbox live to see how utterly idiotic that claim is.
        
        “3. 1 in 4. Actually 1 in 5 for rape (CDC, 2011) 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men experience intimate partner sexual violence. For things less than rape, the stats are much higher. I don’t actually know any adult women who have not experienced some form of sexual violence or harassment.”
        
        Yeah. I guess you’re right. As long as you count (as the people who conducted the study did) any woman who had had one drink of alcohol before having sex as having been raped. Even if the woman herself didn’t consider the consensual sex rape. I wonder how many of those rape cases were husbands who had sex with their wives on their wedding nights after toasting with a glass of champagne? And I won’t even go into the fact that if BOTH of them had a glass of champagne and had consensual sex afterwards, only the WOMAN was considered to have been raped. If we’re equals, then why is it that men are expected to be responsible for their actions when they drink, but women aren’t?
        
        “4. Irony. Right. This site claims to be about gamergate – ethics in journalism! ! But it took less than a day to be all about Girls need to shut up so we can talk about games. This is about losing absolute control of the conversation, and losing influence with game design because there are women’s considerable dollars making an impact.”
        
        Yep. Irony. Like how you claim it’s about men “losing absolute control of the conversation”, when it’s men who had to invent a site where they could even talk about what they’d like to see in games, where they wouldn’t have their comments deleted because it didn’t meet YOUR litmus test. On second thought, this IS about “losing absolute control of the conversation”. But it’s not us who are upset by this. Obviously it’s you. You seem to resent the fact that there is finally a place where YOU don’t get to have control of what men are, and are not allowed to say. Reddit and 4chan weren’t censoring the hell out of YOUR comments. It’s not YOU who isn’t allowed to have a voice on mainstream gaming sites. Twitter is busy deleting the hell out of GG tweets, and allows pro-ISIS tweets to stand unmolested. And yet you want to claim that YOU’RE the one’s who are being oppressed and locked out of the conversation just because men decided to form ONE SINGLE site where we could speak freely without censors deleting our opinions because they might offend YOU? Un-fucking-believable.
        
        “5. Following you around. Sucks, eh?”
        
        So in other words, you admit that it’s YOU who are the aggressors, following US around and harassing us. Correct? WE want to be left alone, and here YOU are spewing hate and violent rhetoric. Kinda’ makes you sound like a bit of a hypocrite, since it’s obviously YOU doing exactly what you were accusing us of in your first comment. Again. The lack of self awareness continues to blow my mind.
  - Terry “The Invader” Xu
    
    Shrug, gamergate should be anti-feminist first and whatever the other thing second
Jezzer

I really haven’t given Doosh enough credit for how far he’ll go to further his toxic delusions. Congrats on hitching a ride onto Gamergate’s pitiful jock to add to add to the ranks of your Fedora Army.
- Contemplationist
  
  Can you retards find better insults than ‘fedora’ already? Nevermind, just kill yourself.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    I see you have found incredibly more effective and creative insults.
    - JacobDeadMan
      
      Not really an insult. It’s an accurate observation of behavior. Don’t get mad when someone gives an accurate representation of reality.
      
      #BTFO
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Did you SERIOUSLY use schoolyard kid tactics against me? In the wrong conversation thread?
        
        I feel like I’m slaughtering level 2 boars in full raid equipment here.
      - JacobDeadMan
        
        Why do you people feel the need to infect everything with your bullshit? Is it because you are cancer? Or is it because you are herpes?
        
        P.S. Just because they were used in school doesn’t mean they aren’t useful. Unlike those gender studies diplomas the majority of you retards are sporting.
        
        #rekt
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA~!
      - Contemplationist
        
        I think you hit a nerve there with the gender studies comment. These people are nothing if not slimy parasites with worthless degrees oozing with arrogance.
      - JacobDeadMan
        
        I know i hit a nerve. It was a critical hit. ahahah. 😉
  - Social Justice Dwarf Rogue
    
    It’s about ethics in telling people to kill themselves
    - JacobDeadMan
      
      False equivalency. The comments in the the comments section do not represent the site or its message. Those comments only hold weight to the individual making the comments.
      
      Otherwise your dumbass comments would make it a SJW site just like all the others.
      
      You people make it so easy to #rekt you. It’s sad really.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Ah, but I can #Rekt you just as easily!
        
        #rekt
        
        HAHA! And so you are outplayed! By putting that hashtag in I have immediately won the argument with this fourteen year old boy!
      - JacobDeadMan
        
        Haha. Great comment. You have a good night now.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        It has been fantastic.
      - JacobDeadMan
        
        Haha. Great comment.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Finally a little bit of SJW backlash in the black teacher, Vinita Hegwood, is getting fired for telling white students to kill themselves.
      - Travis
        
        But… that’s free speech! It’s not like she was a straight white guy who told a girl “You look nice today!”. Not EVEN on the same level as the hate speech spouted by the hated Caucasian cis-genders. Go back to your cave, racist!
- Titan000
  
  Your insults are so cliche be more creative.
Social Justice Dwarf Rogue

“I aim to protect the interests of heterosexual Western males”

TROLOLOLOLO

Oh man, The Onion has really.topped themselves in creating this.

What? This dude is for real? He really thinks .. *laugh* … That heterosexual … *guffaw*… Western males … *chortle*… Are threatened?

I am one and you sir, are a fucking douche.

(Also, just “wanting women to be the best version is evenhanded” or whatever is such laughable nonsense that you are squarely within Poe’s Law. I prefer my woven to be strong, independent, and intelligent. Not bimbo fuck toys. But hey, I’m not a raging misogynistic Neanderthal)

TROLOLO oh man, I can’t believe this dude is serious.
- Harland
  
  What we have here is a prime example of apex fallacy. “All CEOs are white men, therefore all white men are CEOs”. The SJWs have identified white heterosexual males as enemies and nobody may defend them – they ESPECIALLY may not defend themselves. Their proper role is to bend down and take every fleck of spittle thrown their way.
  
  See? It’s right there. There two false choices for women: bimbo or feminist. No gray area, no variation…the calling card of the extremist. Hey, there’s a big, gigantic difference between anti-feminists and misogynists. Anti-feminists despise feminists and think that feminists don’t give a shit about women, as long as everyone is miserable. Misogynists are woman-haters. The woman-hater has a lot in common with his counterpart, the man-hater. Both had horrid, crippling experiences with the opposite sex which have scarred them for life. The anti-feminist has seen the damage feminism has done and gotten really angry about it. And let’s not mince words, feminism has not made women any more happy or made their lives better. It has, however, supplied employment and $$$ for feminists themselves. Yeah, sure, feminists are immune to base human desires like greed…yeah right. That only applies to their enemies, amirite?
  
  It is anti-intellectual to deliberately confuse anti-feminism with misogyny, but that’s exactly what the SJWs like the commenter above have done. And good job too, the media fell for it and is repeating it just like the famous chant of “four legs good, two legs bad.” Where do you find such lapdogs?
  - Vanir
    
    Anti-feminists typically want women weak and dependent. Someone they can control. They often hate women who are strong and free, thus they hate women who are what every sentient, living human should aspire to be. So yes, anti-feminists hate women in general. Because women in general aren’t for men to govern as their own. That is not “anti-intellectual”, but an honest statement drawn from observation.
    - Contemplationist
      
      Those ‘anti-feminists’ only exist in your head. Men appreciate femininity which is not weak by itself.
    - Titan000
      
      You don’t get that femininity is subtle power. And men will give their lives to protect such.
      - Vanir
        
        It is not power, it is behavior that makes other use real power on your behalf.
        
        It is debasing, keeps you dependent, and worst of all; counter productive to growing *real* power for yourself
        
        anti-feminists want women feminine, because they want women without power, and they know (at least on some level) that the power of femininity is not real, but an illusion.
      - Titan000
        
        http://veritaslounge.com/2014/08/15/the-varieties-of-power/
      - Vanir
        
        Just word salad to excuse men discriminating against and keeping women down. In the end, what they here call “Hard Power” is the only power that matters. That is the power women need to aim for – not just being a pleasurable and non-threatening tool for comfort and reproduction that men will want to possess and protect. The “power” that comes with that only matter as long as men let it matter.
      - Titan000
        
        ”Just word salad to excuse men discriminating against and keeping women down.”
        
        Specialization and difference is oppression? And what is your assumption the inequality is inherently zero-sum?
        
        ”In the end, what they here call “Hard Power” is the only power that matters.”
        
        Disagree. Hard-power and Soft-power is inextricably linked. What can man do without woman and woman do without man? Violence is not the only sort of power that man possesses nor is it the only thing that matters. He is also a familial and social creature. Consider the emperor of Japan, he could easily have been killed by the shogun in power yet even as he lacked hard-power they still regarded him as an authority figure. Likewise the medicine man of the Native Americans he lacked the ability to initiate violence yet he was listened to and consulted on matters of spirituality.
      - Vanir
        
        well, women can certainly do more “without men” then they ever could with men holding them down and keeping them weak. regardless of your rhetoric – women are stronger, have more genuine power, and have achieved more, after embracing feminist ideas and values, than they ever did submitting to femininity
      - Titan000
        
        ”holding them down and keeping them weak. regardless of your rhetoric –
        women are stronger, have more genuine power, and have achieved more,
        after embracing feminist ideas and values, than they ever did submitting
        to femininity”
        
        I am sure having the government as their protector and provider is very empowering.
      - Vanir
        
        if true, it would still be more empowering than going through life kow-towing to men.
        however, it’s not – the only thing the government NEEDS to do for women to start building up influence and power, is to recognize them as fully human with rights and liberties, and to safeguard those rights and liberties – same as it does with men
      - Titan000
        
        How is being dependent on government more empowering than kow-towing to men?
      - Fal Phil
        
        Dude, its like trying to explain calculus to a marmot. You are wasting your time.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Women do more to keep women down in the workforce with crab basketing & queen bee tactics than any man would.
    - 1stworlder
      
      The left wants women to see the government as their Baby Daddy thus being dependent.
      - Vanir
        
        Nope. The ideas behind what the government should and should not be is much more complex than that.
        However. The government would certainly be a PREFERABLE “baby daddy” to being dependent on a man
        with power over your day-to-day life.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Enjoy being an old fat cat lady like Gay Nick Denton passed over for being the Top Dog at Jezebel in favor of a 23yo unknown white girls.
      - Vanir
        
        i disagree, obviously
        however, how is this a worse fate than wasting ones life, merely existing,
        for all practical purposes, as a man’s submissive servant and baby-maker?
      - 1stworlder
        
        Women drop out of careers in droves in their 30s hoping to sucker a man into having kids with them. If you want to rut through your 20 like pigs & have abortions till the point no man in his right mind would want to raise kids with you go ahead. Women on the right will not be doing that.
        There is a movement now to keep common core from corrupting kids brains. You can be an evolutionary dead end and you ideas will die with you. Simply reading them Aesop’s fables and letting them know that White Privilege is Evolution which is why Asians have it also is all it takes to prevent brainwashing.
      - Vanir
        
        oooh. i sense double standards.
        sorry mate, but men who think women
        are bad for acting the same as they do,
        aren’t worth reproducing with, anyway.
        
        on the white privilege is evolution thing…
        i have no idea what you mean or even what
        you are talking about.
    - Sgt P
      
      Women are in fact weak and dependent, and there is nothing they can do about it, except enlist the government and cops to bludgeon anyone who speaks the fact that women are weak and dependent.
      
      Have you taken your meds today? They include psych meds and birth control, if you are a woman. Have you stocked up on feminine hygiene supplies yet, and planned your month around your period? Try not to travel or go on dates during your period. (If you’re a man, you’re not dependent on that kinda stuff.)
      - Vanir
        
        nope. women are only dependent if men force them into a position of dependency
        as for psych meds? if true, better than having men’s suicide rate – so maybe men should depend more on meds?
        
        and yeah, women have periods – but you are kind of right, women shouldn’t care so much about
        products and if they are on their period. it’s natural – if some men find the tang icky, sucks to be them 😀
      - Sgt P
        
        nope. women are only independent if a man enables them to pretend as much. and also only if they cut out their sexual organs which bind them so.
        
        men don’t need meds to reduce suicide, they need respect and outlets.
        
        ok, you are obviously a troll now that i read your comment about periods. why am i wasting my time. real feminists only plz.
      - Vanir
        
        well. sterilizing oneself is certainly preferable to going through life as a slave.
        and women are capable of supporting themselves, also in nature (in hunter-
        gatherer societies, women oft bring in majority of calories). it’s the women
        who are dependent on men for survival, who ARE a unnatural creation of men’s “civilization”
        
        also. quite serious about the period thing.
        it’s natural, we should stop treating it like a curse
        there’s a bit of metallic tang, so? humans are flesh and blood
        did you know women also naturally have HAIR on their BODIES
        also something we need to stop make bad and icky
  - Social Justice Dwarf Rogue
    
    **wank wank wank wank**
Dr. Hunky Jimpjorps

> I’m not a gamer

top kek
nwhatz

Haha you poor deluded dumbfucks. You say horrible shit to and about women to ‘help them be their best selves’ but turn into squalling brats shitting themselves when faced with even the gentlest admonitions that acting like a shit head to women will not get them to like you. Enjoy sniffing each others farts. Oh and your mom wants you to come out of your room and clean up the mess you made with the pizza rolls.
- Brononymous
  
  It’s fascinating how emotionally and intellectually-immature SJW’s are. They claim to hate toxic masculinity, but they write like teenage boys, and seem obsessed with gross-out / bodily function humour. It’s strangely-Freudian, like they really do see the masculine as something to aspire to, because their imitation of it is desperate and pathetic. Why should we take the blame for their obvious internalised-misogyny?
  - Travis
    
    This. I would really, really like to actually debate with one of these clowns, but it’s impossible. Because their entire argument seems to consist of “Enjoy sniffing each others farts!”
- 1stworlder
  
  Are you kidding me even Roger Elliot was smart enough to realize that women would rather date guys that gave them black eyes than date nice guys.
  - nwhatz
    
    You mean the UCSB murderer? He’s certainly the authority I would cite while gaslighting as a movement that is in no way founded on childish, reactionary hatred of women and other various targets of resentment.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Well if there was anything Rosie Oddonel was smart enough to figure out she could be used as even the stupidest can understand it argument.
http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon

Thank you, Roosh. A safe space for gamers who love games the way they are and are sick of SJW bullshit is sorely needed.
- Mister_Misinformed
  
  A safe space? I thought Gamergate was all about saying that death threats on the internet are meaningless and never hurt anyone! You guys are supposed to have thick skins and laugh off criticism, ’cause it’s only the internet! Sounding a little wussy here, King Bob.
  - thrillith
    
    Yeah what is this, a fucking hug box for the thin skinned, weak minded straight white male?
    - http://conservativenewswire.wordpress.com/ Conservative Newswire
      
      Criticism is only meant to improve someone if they’re a woman. If they’re a man and you criticize, they need a safe space run by non-gamers! Cause #ethics!
      - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
        
        Criticize away. You’ll get bored away from the echo chambers you’re used to.
    - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
      
      I don’t need the kind of hugbox feminists create for themselves like bees build a hive. I only need a place where I won’t be banned for “offensive” content (posting facts) as I have been on several progressive forums trying to maintain their fragile narrative. Where competition of ideas is allowed, political correctness quickly topples.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Name a non Asian/White nation you would like to live in? White privilege is evolution, Asians have it also. It works for everything but short distance runs because Asians & whites evolved under similar conditions where they had to build/plan/store to survive winters with no growing food.
  - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
    
    Safe from censorship and banning on trumped up “misogyny” accusations, obviously.
  - 1stworlder
    
    When hoes send themselves death threats & have that as their main form of income they cant hurt themselves.
- Jim
  
  Thin skinned pussy.
Why Internet Why

Aha…ahahha… I really can’t believe the internet has spawned scum like this. This has gotta be some twisted social experiment or something right?

Please, dear god, let all Gamergaters wallow in their own filth here while the rest of us get on with our lives.

Grow up, dude. Your safe space is literally everywhere.
- Contemplationist
  
  If that’s so how do you explain the same slander against “white, cis-het dudebro douchebags” on all gaming sites and by ‘megaphones’ like Leigh Alexander? You retards lack self-awareness.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Well you see, there’s a bunch of dudebro douchebags going around being jackholes to a bunch of other people and ruining everything while acting like self-entitled pissbabies.
    
    Therefore, attacking said Dudebro Douchebags publically in an attempt to get them to stop is quite necessary.
    
    And I mean… If someone says “Dudebro Douchebags are a pain in the ass.” and your immediate reaction is to get angry for being insulted my first point of advice is to STOP BEING A DUDEBRO DOUCHEBAG.
    - Phil Carson
      
      Cool story dudebro.
    - Brononymous
      
      If being a dudebro is so bad, why are edgy feminists always swearing non-stop in pathetic imitation of what they misunderstand masculinity to be?
      
      I mean “douchebags”, “Jackholes”, “pissbabies”. You write like a suburban kid whose balls haven’t dropped trying to prove he’s a tough guy, running behind the cool kids.
      
      If you’re doing it to prove that girls don’t have to be sweet and nice and can be as vulgar as men, congrats, you’re a highly-educated person who funcation on the level of a vulgar 10 year old, and it only cost you 30 years of student debt.
      
      Education is wasted on the privileged.
  - Why Internet Why
    
    Maybe because that “slander” is actually warranted? You’d think, being a paragon of “self-awareness” as you are, seeing the same issues pop up all over the internet would raise a red flag. Guess not. Enjoy your blissful ignorance!
    - Contemplationist
      
      A self-referential circle-jerk is not evidence. GamerGate exists because retards in the New York Times refer to retards at Kotaku, who refer to retards at Gamasutra, who all know each other. Then Wikipedia retards refer to these ‘real sources’ to come to unsupported conclusions. Your circle jerk won’t work anymore.
  - nwhatz
    
    People calling you an asshole for acting like an asshole is not censorship or oppression or slander or anything but calling you an asshole for acting like an asshole. In this case you are acting like an asshole. You are an asshole.
    - Brononymous
      
      Except when we call out Leigh “I destroyed a girl’s career today” Alexander for being an asshole – like for getting a bartender fired because she didn’t give her the level of service her majesty believes she deserves – it suddenly becomes harassment and misogyny, because you’re all cowards at heart, wanting to criticise everyone else whilst bursting into tears at the slightest criticism being applied to yourself.
      
      Yeah, yeah, I know. “That’s totally not the same thing!”
- http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
  
  Except where discussing “offensive” ideas (truth not approved by SJW elites) gets you censored, banned, doxxed, etc.
- 1stworlder
  
  Everywhere straight white males go everyone wants in. There is no one sneaking into Africa, or Mexico. Except for east Asians everyone who is not white wants to leech off of the white mans welfare system. The real white supremacists are the ones risking life & limb breaking the law to sneak into Whiteopia
ThrownTrash

Some #gamergate users don’t want to associate with politics, and you seem to have done just that and made the site solely against SJWs and leftists. You are giving an image to the hashtag by obviously stating so. DON’T, you said it yourself that you aren’t a gamer so try disconnecting the site from GG and politics and don’t bother with the “safe space” and “inclusiveness” bull, it sounds just like the ones we’re critiquing since they use just that for censoring others.

Besides that:
Consider rewording this shit. Don’t put “create a safe space for
white men”. You’re just asking to be attacked. Put it in parenthesis; it’s just what most journalists accuse anyone they dislike of being. Most gamers are from multicultural backgrounds and don’t give a shit. They
aren’t there for the “multicultural environment”, but the “gamer
culture” and the hobby itself.
- Roosh_V
  
  You do it your way by starting your own gaming site. I do it my way. If you don’t like it, don’t read.
  - ThrownTrash
    
    I’m just saying. Consider leaving it at “good ethics policy” and “Gaming without the SJW/Safety/inclusivity bull”; and you got a good site.
  - ThrownTrash
    
    Let’s see how it goes though. I’m interested in being able to submit articles and I hope this article doesn’t reflect poorly on it’s start-up.
    
    Best of luck.
- http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
  
  The topics are inexorably linked. Corruption is endemic to progressive (SJW) politics, and it’s the SJWs who are attacking #GamerGate the loudest with their same Alinskyite identity-politics propaganda. They are never going to let you have the conversation you want to have unless you address the topics in tandem.
- Titan000
  
  Clickbait man.
- Kirijo
  
  GGers who don’t want to associate with politics are naive and ignorant fools. This whole ordeal was caused by said “SJWs” and “leftists”. It’s political by default.
- 1stworlder
  
  The history of civilization has been different ideas being tried with success or failure. Progressivism is all 19 century failed Marxist ideas. East Asians and Whites pulled ahead because what they had worked better than anyone else. By all means make a better site if you can.
Deanna Leigh

What. Is. Wrong. With. You?!

I am the best version of myself. And by the way, I noted that about half the audience at Blizzcon were … WOMEN. Omfg. And can you believe we want to have safe spaces to game?! Be in guilds where the word “rape” only comes up in a serious conversation on the subject? Have strong female characters that aren’t baby machines and don’t all fall to pieces over relationships.

Women are gamers. We are here to stay. And all we want is to be recognized for already being “our best selves” and have that reflected in the characters we play. And we can totally change male characters to be fatter and have bigger boobs, too, because I know men are also sensitive to the pressure of looking like GQ models constantly.

Lesson I learned today reading your article: just because someone is a good writer doesn’t mean he knows what he is talking about.

You know about white male privilege and that’s about it.
- Roosh_V
  
  Pics? I’ll be the judge of your beauty.
  - ephena
    
    totes about ethics. ahahahaha
  - nwhatz
    
    What do pictures have to do with ethics in journalism? Oh wait…
  - hamster_in_a_butt
    
    Hmmm I wonder what this gross man thinks about a woman’s appearance
    - NotActuallyHere
      
      It is very important remember. All women everywhere should specifically tailor their appearance to suit this particular man’s tastes (And they should care about that) instead of doing what they feel is best for them.
      - Titan000
        
        That’s right Tits or GTFO.
      - hamster_in_a_butt
        
        [pauses for breath] ahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
      - Roosh_V
        
        If she is interested in having a dialogue with me, then yes, I must approve of her beauty before I make any investment of my time.
      - hamster_in_a_butt
        
        HAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAH
      - MercuryPixel
        
        I knew it, this site is a joke-site.
        
        You’re anti-GG right? because you wanna burn them to the ground.
      - Guest
        
        ‘Best for them’ = meeting the standards of approval of their immediate female peers controlled by the Queen Bee. You either serve the patriarchy or
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Finish a freakin’ sentence, apparently.
      - Travis
        
        Kind of like all men everywhere should tailor their thoughts and speech to suit this particular woman’s (or whatever it is you claim to be) tastes instead of doing what they feel is best for them? So women should feel free to be themselves and do whatever they want, but men need your approval for the same thing?
  - Brononymous
    
    This is the best they can do, apparently. So much for real women not needing makeup.
    
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/imaansheikh/boss-ladies-are-here
  - MercuryPixel
    
    ‘Cause “ethics”.
    
    Hehehe, oh God, this site NEEDS TO BE A JOKE.
    
    In fact, I bet this site was done by an Anti-GG dude or girl because it’s too trainwrecky to be true XD
- http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
  
  Why the hell are you discussing rape topics in your guild? This is what is wrong with SJWs in gaming. When we log on to Battle.net or Xbox Live, many of us want to play games, not have a debate on rape culture and the patriarchy.
  - Vanir
    
    The word is free. You don’t like adult conversations in your Guild? Drop it and find one where rape is just lolz.
    - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
      
      They are free to try to push their odious political agenda into my hobby. I am free to oppose it.
      - Vanir
        
        You certainly have a right to speak up against the oh-so-horrid-people who care about social justice, but you have no right to silence them any more than they have the right to silence you.
      - http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
        
        I have never silenced or advocating silencing anyone. Unlike SJWs like Sarkeesian, et al, I don’t support censorship of “offensive” views. I will, however, mock, shame, and refute the arguments of those who attack me and my hobby.
      - Brononymous
        
        Social justice is just a polite way of saying ‘mob justice’, and, lord knows, the whim of the mob is never, ever wrong.
      - Vanir
        
        Nope, the ideals and values of “social justice warriors” is not dependent on having numbers on ones side.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Yep it just that whitey is wrong and suppresses everyone in the entire world but somehow east Asians managed to avoid it. Rabbit think welcomes predation that’s why 1400 little white girls raped by muslims was not noticed by any feminist but a woman blowing 24 guys on video in a bar contest for a $7 drink gets every fem out their crying rape.
      - Vanir
        
        wow. that what I’m all about? all the things you learn.
        esp. the islamist thing… you really think I have a soft spot for them? really? i draw the line long before you even get to the RoK league of misogyny… why would i accept or ignore islamic extremist treating women like cattle?
      - Travis
        
        Again. Ironic. You can obviously know everything about us by reading one or two comments. But we shouldn’t judge you by yours?
    - Travis
      
      Wow. How can you not see the irony here?
      - Vanir
        
        How so? Not trying to silence the anti-progs and woman haters. But will not let them silence us.
      - Travis
        
        And yet, here you are. We aren’t having this conversation on a SJW site. YOU chose to come HERE. Not the other way around. Basically you just said, “You don’t like your guild? Drop it and find one you do like.” Couldn’t I say the same to you? You don’t like what people on this website have to say, so go find a website where you DO like what the people have to say? Why does the idea that people might meet somewhere on the web and say something you don’t like or disagree with bother you so much?
      - Vanir
        
        because my response to ideas i find horribly offensive, and straight out evil, is not to ignore that they exist, it is to engage. nothing good comes from ignoring evil.
      - Travis
        
        “:Not trying to silence the anti-progs and woman haters. But will not let them silence us.”
        
        So in other words, this entire statement was complete bullshit, right? You admit that no one is trying to silence you, and instead, it’s YOU trying to silence others….
  - keddren
    
    Way to completely miss the point.
- Vanir
  
  You are essentially like a black person trying to reason with the leader of the KKK. It is meaningless. Roosh does not see you or other women as fully human, he sees you as things that exist to either benefit or pleasure males, or that are otherwise worthless.
  
  His idea of “strange worldview” is seeing women as strong, capable people, with inherent value, who exist to live strong and free and act in their own right, same as men.
  
  He wants a “space” for men where they don’t have to treat women as people, and where they are “free” from voices that remind them of how horrid and dehumanizing that is.
  - Roosh_V
    
    “You are essentially like a black person trying to reason with the leader of the KKK. ”
    
    I loled
    - Vanir
      
      I can imagine. Fools often laugh to hide their faults. Especially from themselves.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Hey man, don’t knock bursting into absolute laughter over this whole shebang. If you can’t find the humor in this scenario you can’t laugh at anything.
      - Vanir
        
        Well, there IS certainly a positive to this. Next time a Gator claims “ethics in vidya games” – i’ll link to this page 😀
        
        And if it’s a notyourshield-feminist-Gator… watching cognitive dissonance at work is always fun.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Far better than you have failed at trying to Disqualify Roosh
  - Brononymous
    
    >”His idea of “strange worldview” is seeing women as strong, capable people, with inherent value, who exist to live strong and free and act in their own right, same as men.”
    
    Then live strong, and stop crying about being victimised by the phantom patriarchy; being triggered by every second word; calling any kind of criticism ‘harrassment'; and having meltdowns if someone wishes you a ‘good day’ on the street; because all of that seems like whiny, hysterical neurosis born of extreme suburban comfort and privilege.
    - Vanir
      
      Only the weak would remain silent when people try to discriminate, harass or otherwise victimize them. The strong speak up. The strong fight it. The strong do NOT tolerate it!
      - Brononymous
        
        The strong sob on Tumblr. The strong whine on Twitter. The strong take their Xanax. The strong get PSTD from someone farting near them on the street. The strong know it’s sideways for attention, longways for results. The strong need mommy and daddy to pay for their Williamsburg Loft. THE STRONG TYPE IN ALL CAPS WHEN THEIR SELF-CONSTRUCT IS UNDER THREAT. The strong build nothing and criticise everything. The strong want everyone else to be as mediocre as they are, so they’re excused from effort. Every word the strong say: every single broken, backwards, defective ideological thought being espoused on social media is being logged and aggregated by the NSA, who believes in power for power’s sake, not human rights, and definitely isn’t on the side of the strong. The strong are so socially-broken they will breed their cherished-ideology out of existence within a generation.
      - Vanir
        
        Yeah. keep thinking that the strong are the ones who let themselves be silenced by harassment – not the one speaking up about it 😀
        and refusing to become a breeding machine in a trad-prison marriage, is not being “socially broken” – it’s having basic pride in oneself and desire for freedom. and i’m not really worried, progressive women are more frequently reproducing on their own terms, not on the terms of ancient, misogynist patriarchs (or their modern-day fans)
      - 1stworlder
        
        If only all these strong independent blah blah blah blah blah, could just organize they could create games for themselves. Given that tech is almost entirely Asian/white men if equalism exists there must be literally “tons” of talented non Asian minorities to form their own company. Oh wait the tech company with the most non Asian minorities failed to create the Obamacare website, while 3 Asian/white guys in CA created a site for their state for free that had everything the O-care site lacked.
      - Brononymous
        
        ‘Their own terms’ = 40 year old women pumping out autistic children after $80,000 worth of IVF therapy. Like I said, out of existence within a generation
      - Vanir
        
        guess we’ll just have to see.
        like i said, i’m not worried
      - 1stworlder
        
        The weak call drinking coffee and chatting equal work.
  - Travis
    
    As opposed to people like yourself. Who believe in equality. As long as men shut up and don’t say anything you don’t like.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Equality is a slogan based on envy. It signifies in the heart of every citizen: ‘Nobody is going to occupy a place higher than I.'” — Alexis de Tocqueville
    - Vanir
      
      Nope. But i DO put equality first. I.e. if men ATTACK women’s rights and freedoms – those men are obviously trouble. Bit difficult to get along with someone who sees your legal and personal rights and liberty as a problem (specifically when the “problem” it causes, is that having equal rights mean they cannot dominate and control you, which is bad because *insert misogynist / fascist / evo-psych / religious rant here*)
      - Travis
        
        Can you please point on where Roosh is attacking women’s rights or freedoms? I don’t see him going to female geared sites and telling them what they should, or should not be allowed to say. Seems like the only person wanting to limit rights and freedoms here is you.
      - Vanir
        
        and where have i said anything about limiting rights and freedom?
        
        however, there is certainly RoK material that proves Roosh wants women to be weak and submissive,
        that proves he wants men to be in charge of women like they were half-people, not full individuals.
        as such Roosh quite OFTEN attack the freedom and rights (and basic humanity) of women
      - Travis
        
        YOU, by your very actions, are seeking to control the speech of others. YOU seem to think that the only voices that have a right to be heard are those that you agree with. And so what if Roosh WANTS women to be weak and/or submissive? In what way is he trying to force or coerce you into behaving that way? Can you give me any specific examples of the ways he’s trying to take away your rights or freedoms?
      - Vanir
        
        can you give any example of how i’m trying to take away yours?
        by stating my opinion?
      - Travis
        
        Since I asked you first, I think it’s only right that you answer my question before I answer any of yours.
      - theliberatorofbados
        
        Honestly, women had all the freedom they could have wanted thanks to the Civil Rights Act which explicitly covers discrimination not just based off of race but also sex. Anything introduced after that is overkill and unnecessary. It just adds bloat to an already bloated welfare/bureaucratic state that has become the cancer to our society (the recent elections show that Americans are fed up with this and in Britain and Europe people are growing fed up with it as well).
        
        The bottom line as far as the gaming industry goes is that doing real work–of any kind–is a merit-based affair. The stats show that a lot of women don’t or can’t put in the same kind of effort that men do (overtime, working harder, working weeks without days off). Women also don’t tend go into physically demanding fields or blue-collar work because they don’t want to or it’s simply too rigorous for them. The few that are in these fields are there because they WANT to be there, not because there was political pressure to have more women in these fields. It’s no different with the gaming industry.
        
        We had plenty of diversity in gaming even in its infancy. We had Roberta Williams, among others (if anybody knew a lot about the history of gaming this would be clear). People like these older developers based off of merit, not just their gender. We seem to have a lot of female game developers going into this field not to make games to entertain an audience but to push agendas and/or for personal vanity. Gamers can sense this and this is why they get hostility from them, and not just from “straight white guys”.
        
        Gaming throughout its history has always been inclusive and diverse among its players. This is why people had such a negative reaction to the likes of Sarkesian because they knew what she was saying was bullshit and flew in the face of reality. The reality is that the likes of Sarkesian are the ones sowing discord in what was a harmonious gaming community, and polluting it with her political vitriol (although I’m giving her too much credit, she’s just another Jack Thompson saying “think of the women!” instead of “think of the children!”). And the “gaming press” let it happen. They showed open contempt for their audience when they didn’t swallow the Kool-Aid and now that’s finally come back to bite them in the ass, and it’s exposed the whole freakshow of SJW culture in the process for all to see.
        
        And now amount of rhetoric is going to undo that.
      - Vanir
        
        “harmonious community”?
        sarkeesian only exposed what was there, she did not create it
        and there is nothing wrong with wanting games that
        support a more progressive narrative. it’s not “more”
        political than wanting games with a trad narrative –
        your preferences is no less “political” than ours
        SJWs like me simply want the games we play to not be sexist.
        to show women as acting, strong agents on par with men, not
        mainly as damsels and/or eye candy. and of course we will
        be vocal about it. and that is free speech, NOT censorship
- Contemplationist
  
  Very fact that you felt the need to throw a hissy fit on a site that isn’t trying to take away anyone else’s voice proves the need for this site. What’s the problem exactly?
- Titan000
  
  Deanna’s Brain:
  
  I am a strong empowered wymyn who can’t even stand the thought that other women are more pretty than meee.
  - Vanir
    
    Titan000s “Brain”
    
    wo-man write things man-ego do not like
    must silence wo-man, must mock wo-man
    - Titan000
      
      @Vanir
      Sorry that does not work. Since you are not basing it on contradictory statements that I am making. If a person is so self-assured why would he hate having others being better than him?
    - Titan000
      
      And she provided ample material for me to work with. If one makes a solid logical argument based on evidence I cannot troll them.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Leftists lie to women thinking they can have it all. Leftists want sex ed taught in kindergarten but flip out at telling women that if they don’t have kids by 35 its not going to happen. At 40 there is only a 5% chance on natural conception for women creating old ugly cat ladies.
      - Vanir
        
        women should certainly strive for it all. nothing wrong with that. having kids is however not an absolute must. it’s a choice. and if a woman WANT to delay it, she can just freeze her eggs. acceptable risk involved, compared to risk of ending up a dependent little wifey by going the trad route
      - Titan000
        
        ”it’s a choice. and if a woman WANT to delay it, she can just freeze her
        eggs. acceptable risk involved, compared to risk of ending up a
        dependent little wifey by going the trad route”
        
        http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-14251.html
      - Vanir
        
        your link is just complaining who from people don’t like women to have this possibility (gee, shocker, misogynists who want to control women don’t want women to have sexual freedom). i would have to reply; and your point is..?
        though it kind of exposes that the point IS to keep women down for dominance’ own sake – not any actual concern for reproduction. the “lack of consequences” for women who enjoy their sexuality is seen as an inherent negative, not as a reason to stop trying to control them.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Spend $50,000+ for the chance to squat out a 3 month early premi. Oh wait O-Holecare takes money from productive taxpayers to provide that now. Before O-Holecare Asians and whites where better off getting a catastrophic plan until they hit 50 or had kids, now they have to subsidize the 3rdworld.
      - Vanir
        
        uhh. i take it you are against “big government”?
        i disagree. but party politics is something you
        adapt to. if government don’t subsidize, you have
        to take that into account. don’t change that a
        woman is better off doing it her own way, than
        letting herself be caught in a position of having
        to depend on a man, reduced from an actual
        individual into “his little wifey”
  - Brononymous
    
    #AllFeministsAreUgly
- Ann
  
  Gosh, when I game all I want to be recognized for is how consistently I crit, or how I support my team in BGs. I
  don’t need to be recognized or have anything “reflected” in my
  character aside from whether or not I was able to keep the tank alive,
  or not pull mobs before everyone is ready, or not lose my nerve when
  being chased by a wave of undead, or taking out an entire mob area with
  an AOE so the tank can safely get to the boss unfettered with the
  mundane task of taking them out one by one. It seems you want the
  privilege of having a title bestowed upon you for just “being your best
  self.” I hope I run into you on a PVP server. I’ll show you what being
  your best self in gaming means.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Please tell me how being able to overcome someone in a PVP battle in whatever game is your personal forte makes you a better person.
    - Ann
      
      It may not make me a better person, but it sure as hell makes me a better gamer.
      
      There are no people in-game. There are only party members, or potential honorable kills. If you prefer to be seen as a good person in-game, you will become a potential honorable kill. See you on the battleground. Bring your boas. You’ll need them.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Nah, I think I’ll stick to Street Fighter.
        
        Actually takes skill.
      - Ann
        
        Street Fighter? Takes skill? Seriously? /guffaw
        
        Child’s play. Good game for beginners. If you decide to take your training wheels off, meet me in Azeroth and get punished.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Blehehehehehe!
        
        And just like that you have been reduced to the wormlike state of being a filthy MMO plebian who thinks big numbers are more important than reflexes!
        
        Have at you, knave! How dare you claim to be hardcore! TRUE GAMERS ARE TWITCH INCARNATE! A click-junkie like you would be eaten alive in Ninja Gaiden or Devil May Cry!
        
        Fucking Casuals, I tell you. Console Gamer Master Race 4Lyfe.
      - TheWastelander
        
        “Console Gamer Master Race”
        
        http://img.pandawhale.com/post-25049-laughing-out-loud-lol-gif-Now-xlnU.gif
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        This is actually the intended reaction to that post so… Thanks?
      - 1stworlder
        
        Yea no other players to complain about having to carry you.
- 1stworlder
  
  Women paid to be there don’t count. White privilege is evolution that’s why Asians have it also.
- Guest
  
  @Deanna Leigh
  
  The whole world is already your safe-space, barring perhaps the Middle East, parts of Africa and Somalia.
- Caploxion
  
  @Deanna Leigh
  
  The whole world is already your safe-space, barring perhaps the Middle East and parts of Africa.
Sara

Despite being a female I can comprehend the idea that men can have their own site where they can be men. Just like other women sites (like Mamamia etc.).

But be prepared. Feminists don’t like ANYTHING that doesn’t benefit them.

“MENZ WANT A PLACE WHERE THEY CAN HANG OUT WITHOUT BEING REFERRED TO AS RAPISTS AND MYSOGGYKNEESTS EVERY TWELVE SECONDS AND BE THEMSELVES!! HOW DARE THEY!!!!”
- ephena
  
  but but but gamergate is about women too! I read it somewhere. they have girl friends and stuff.
  - Sara
    
    A pro-gamergate site for men. I understand that the ‘for men’ concept is a little hard to get.
    - ephena
      
      advertised as “a gaming site for those who support gamergate”, which in his mind means just straight boys, because when push comes to shove they will throw you under the bus like last night’s condom.
      - TheWastelander
        
        Condoms? We rawdog.
      - ephena
        
        Sara, I think you have an offer.
      - ephena
        
        Woooo. Literally under 15 minutes from Girl Stands Up For GG to My Penis is More Important Than You Not Getting Pregnant or Diseased.
      - TheWastelander
        
        If you post another reply I’ll let you make me dinner.
      - Ulick McGee
        
        Not her, you. Unless you’re too heavy to pick up, in which case, we’ll throw a cupcake under the bus and watch you dive under.
      - Carpenter E
        
        Aww, ephena had her widdle feelings hurt. You are gnashing your teeth at the thought of a gaming site that doesn’t conform to the propaganda you swallow every day. Pathetic.
      - ephena
        
        Nope. Not hurt. Not offended. Teeth are fine. Just seriously amused. You guys think you are defending the faith, that you are the one true bulwark against the world, and that you will save, whatever it is that you think you are saving, but it ain’t happening. I watched your little twitter storm last night, and you guys were overshadowed by basketball and global warming – oh. And something about the Kardashians. Ouch.
      - Terry “The Invader” Xu
        
        You hurt, you offended
        
        That’s why you here crying about it
        
        Guess what baby, equality doesn’t exist outside the minds of teenage white girls
- hamster_in_a_butt
  
  Hey Roosh, here’s another female! Why don’t you hound her for pics, make sure she’s attractive enough?
  - John Galt
    
    She’s not a deranged SJW . I think she’ll get a pass from us evil cis-privileged rayciss rapists.
    - hamster_in_a_butt
      
      hmmm I’m gonna need some pics of you to prove you’re attractive enough for me to engage with you before I respond
      - Sgt P
        
        Why do you judge attractiveness based on looks alone? You are a jerk. She and other female commenters are attractive when they are polite, feminine, and honest. Who cares what they look like. We are more concerned with how she behaves. (Physical looks are not important for internet comments. Romance is another matter.)
    - Vanir
      
      True, she’s acting like a good little girl who defers to the menfolk when they decide what her place as a woman should be.
      
      “Of course men shouldn’t have to treat me like a competent, equal human. I’m just here to look pretty and make babies. Tihihi.”
      - Travis
        
        “True, she’s acting like a good little girl who defers to the menfolk when they decide what her place as a woman should be.”
        
        Just out of curiosity, can you clarify which part of her statement you’re getting that from? Was it the part where she said she understood why men wouldn’t enjoy being called rapists and misogynists every twelve seconds? Is that what you consider “deferring to the menfolk”?
      - Vanir
        
        getting it from her sucking up to misogynist men, yeah.
        
        and i do wonder why many men keep ignore / excuse / want the sexist depiction of women in many games.
        i also wonder why its so horrible to those men, that people who want progression, speak their mind about it
      - Travis
        
        Because we play games to have fun. And we resent you having to insert yourself and your beliefs in every aspect of our lives. You don’t like a game? Don’t play it. Support the games you DO like. But that doesn’t seem to be enough for you. YOU have to make sure that WE only get to play the types of games that you like, too. Go do your thing. Head over to tumbler and commiserate on how the patriarchy is keeping you down with the other man hating feminists. Just leave us the fuck alone. Why is that so hard?
      - Vanir
        
        uh. we obviously will be vocal about what kind of games we WOULD prefer.
        so we’ll keep playing the games we like. AND be vocal about what we like
        vote with wallet AND voice.
        nothing wrong with that
        
        and YOU are already “inserting your beliefs” into games just as much as we try to do.
        the current default is not some universal absolute standard. the “macho hero saving
        the damsel power-fantasy” is in every way as much politics and ideology as the more
        progressive narratives we would prefer to see in games.
      - Travis
        
        But here’s the difference. If YOU want to play a game with an overweight feminist on anti-depressants as the heroine, we don’t care. We aren’t going to try to force the company which produced the game to turn the hero into a big, strapping, macho guy. We simply don’t care what games you want to play. If it makes you happy, then more power to you. But that doesn’t seem to be your attitude towards us. YOU have to control not only the games YOU play, but the games WE play as well. In your mind, there is only room on the market for the games that YOU deem to be acceptable. And any game which doesn’t fit YOUR ideals or beliefs needs to be changed to suit you.
      - Vanir
        
        you do realize that very often we play the same kind of games, right?
        it’s not that we try to control the games only you play,
        it’s that we try to influence the games we want to play
        
        f.ex the witcher would have had just as awesome game-play and overall story without the
        misogynist atmosphere. many of us would like to play something like the witcher,
        but without those icky elements. so we make this opinion known. should we not?
      - Travis
        
        I have to run, Vanir. But even though I strongly disagree with you, I respect the fact that you’re at least willing to enter into debate as opposed to resorting to childish name calling. Which is more than I can say for the vast majority of SJW’s. I’d be more than happy to continue this discussion later tonight if you’re still around.
      - Vanir
        
        tomorrow maybe, got work in the morning
        and it’s certainly been interesting
        good night to you
      - Matt McCoy
        
        “f.ex the witcher would have had just as awesome game-play and overall story without the
        misogynist atmosphere. many of us would like to play something like the witcher,
        but without those icky elements. so we make this opinion known. should we not?”
        
        All there’s left is a crying baby noise in the background to fit the tone of this paragraph. Cry us a river if you think seeing sex and female nudity is misogynistic, you just need to have better self-esteem and be more open minded about sexuality. Plus using The Witcher as an example is downright absurd since it uses sex in the most intelligent way possible.
      - evilwhitemalempire
        
        Are you SJWs allergic to capitalization because you’re anti-capitalists or is the inability to simultaneously hold down the shift key when pressing a letter key now part and parcel of college level literacy these days?
        
        Either way the trend has become rather conspicuous of late.
      - Vanir
        
        the evilwhitemalempire are ALSO grammar nazis?
      - Sgt P
        
        Yes, submissive women are very attractive. The rest need to take a hike. NOT INVITED.
      - Vanir
        
        and this is why many women hate you types, not because they are “eebil feminazi man haters”
        of course they hate the men who want them to be weak and deferential, who want to control them
        it’s quite a natural AND logical response.
      - Travis
        
        And yet, we aren’t on sites for women telling them what they should, and should not be allowed to think and say. And YOU are the one here on a site explicitly designed for men, telling them what THEY should be allowed to think and say. But it’s us who want YOU to be weak and deferential, and who want to control YOU?
      - Vanir
        
        i’m stating my opinion against those who want women to be weak and submissive, wherever i find it.
        wording ones opinions are, last time i checked, not something that determines what others can and
        cannot say.
        
        you keep complaining about evil SJWs and girl cooties all over your games. i’ll keep pointing out how
        dehumanizing this is, and how games really SHOULD be more progressive.
        
        see, words and ideas, you haven’t controlled me from stating my piece with your opinions,
        and i’m pretty sure i haven’t cast any brainwashing voodoo hex on you
      - Travis
        
        Why SHOULD they be more progressive? Because you say so? And who gets to determine exactly what “progressive” means? You? Do we also need to have transexual, African American dwarfs with learning disabilities equally represented as protagonists in games?
        
        And if you aren’t trying to control or oppress me by stating your words or opinions, I’ll agree with that. As long as you also concede that by extension, Roosh and the other ROK writers obviously aren’t trying to control or oppress you either, since all they’re doing is using words to state their opinions.
      - StraightTalk
        
        That’s dishonest. You absolutely would be passing around his personal information and trying to get his employer to fire him if you were privy to that information. You want to control our thoughts, and you’d like to do so by making an example out of him to intimidate us. You simply lack the means at this moment.
      - Vanir
        
        uh. no i would not.
        paranoid much?
      - StraightTalk
        
        Everyone here knows that you know the tactics of your side. Whom do you think you’re fooling by calling me paranoid?
      - Vanir
        
        mhm. should i mention which “side” has been doing the most actual threatening and doxxing in this? these kinds of “tactics” are the mark of anti-SJWs – but i still won’t accuse you all of being responsibe for it
      - StraightTalk
        
        No, these are tactics Democrats in the KKK used against whites who hired or lent money to blacks. Democrats have carried them forward into today in service of feminazis, the gaystapo, the race hustlers, and unions, as everyone here well knows.
      - Sgt P
        
        We don’t WANT women to be weak and deferential, we KNOW women are weak and deferential- according to science. Therefore we like women in their natural state, and dislike women who pretend that all women should be less feminine. Women who are hateful of humanity and nature need to go somewhere else to have their discussions. That’s all. We understand nature has also made some women unfeminine and hateful losers. That’s ok, just take it somewhere else please. Bye.
      - Vanir
        
        nope. women in general are not.
        the ones that ARE, are the exception.
        and not wanting men to make one dependent, to keep one weak, is not hate against nature – it IS nature – a natural response for any being against those that would weaken and control it. and it certainly is not hate against humanity – only the part of humanity that WANT to keep women under their heel, is hated – and again, this is natural
      - Matt McCoy
        
        Science denialist. 😛
      - Terry “The Invader” Xu
        
        Feminists tend to be the most incompetent twits in real life. And the world WOULD work better if women focused on making babies and being pretty
        
        Don’t be a retarded white girl
  - Jim
    
    He deleted those comments but the internet never forgets!
  - Terry “The Invader” Xu
    
    I bet you this fag right here believes in equality
NotActuallyHere

“We won’t exclude homosexuals or attractive women from commenting on our articles…”

Holy fucking Jesus. Holy fucking mecha zombie Jesus. Holy fucking hundred meter tall mecha city-stompin’ tap dancing zombie Jesus. Holy fucking hotblooded hundred meter tall firey final boss mecha grape-soda-powered city-stompin’ tap dancing showtune singing leather corset wearin’ necronomicon summoned zombie jesus.
- Harland
  
  Flip that on its head and realize how other, different classes of people are outright banned from speaking on SJW sites.
  
  “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
  
  You get how outrageous it is? Nah, ya don’t, because when you do it, it’s ok, but when others do it to you, it’s not ok.
  
  “When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.”
  — Louis Veuillot
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Different classes of people? Like what? Extremists? Misogynists? Assholes?
    
    I can definitely see how those sorts of people should be outright banned.
    
    -runs around SJW sites being a heterosexual white male with absolutely zero consequences-
    - Contemplationist
      
      Do you include getting fired as ‘zero’ consequences? Or being slandered like Brad Wardell? See, for slithering worms like you and other SJWs (but I repeat myself), reality is what you think it is, and certain classes of people are simply banned from presenting an alternate point of view. This is how the insanely slimy fuckhead Anil Dash went to lecture a cis-het white male Pax Dickinson on his privilege after Pax was fired. I mean you are stupid enough to not even recognize that you need to reconcile getting fired with ‘privilege.’ If I had this fucking white male privilege I sure as shit would not be anonymous.
      One day all the people you have harassed and gotten fired by labeling them with your ‘isms’ will ensure your destruction. History is cyclical and nothing lasts forever. More people have their eyes opened. So enjoy your SJW privilege while you can. We aren’t fooled anymore.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        “Alternative points of view”
        
        Is that what they’re calling it now?
      - Contemplationist
        
        Yes like debunking the wage gap a million times. Pointing out false rape accusations, among other things. Sensible people realize of course that none of these things are ‘anti-women’ or ‘misogynist’ but SJW slimes have a vested interest in protecting the poisoned fruits of feminist legislation no matter if it even harms innocent people (like Ezra Klein admitted that the California ‘affirmative consent’ law would).
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Continue to educate me about these alternative points of view. I am enraptured.
      - Contemplationist
        
        Of course you aren’t. And I’m not deluded enough to think you have a single sincere bone in your body for the outgroup, which for you is straight white men. http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-anything-except-the-outgroup/
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Nah, I AM a straight white man. I have quite a few friends who are straight white men. I’m Straight White Manning this place UP.
      - Phil Carson
        
        So when does the part come where you actually answer any of his points?
      - NothingMan00
        
        You sure about that?
      - Travis
        
        “Fear not, fair damsels! It is I! NotActuallyHere! I have come to rescue you from these evil, offensive words! In real life, I may be a pale, scrawny virgin who lives in my parents basement and hasn’t seen sunlight or physical activity for years. And if any of these men were to glance crossly at me in the real world, I would of course, curl up into a little ball and beg them not to hurt me. But HERE I am a BRAVE WARRIOR! Determined to smite the evil cis-genders who refuse to grovel and supplicate at your feet!”
        
        “P.S. Will you please, PLEASE have sex with me?”
      - 1stworlder
        
        Beta manginas don’t actually get the girl. In fact even gays want men that are more masculine than you.
      - Travis
        
        But Roosh isn’t. So doesn’t that make you a racist? Quit trying to force your culture on Roosh, you white, cis-gendered asshole. Check your privilege.
      - http://conservativenewswire.wordpress.com/ Conservative Newswire
        
        “the poisoned fruits of feminist legislation”
        Do they teach Bad Soaring Prose 101 to all MRAs? Is it a required course at False Rape University?
      - Brononymous
        
        Obviously, they should have racked up 30 years of student debt to believe that ‘Wow. Just Wow.’ is a critical argument; ‘Really?’ is a punch line, and that ‘literally’ should be used at the exact opposite situation to when it would be applicable.
        
        Upper class white privilege: always producing supercilious morons.
    - 1stworlder
      
      You cant even quote FBI crime statistics on HuffPo without getting banned. You will get banned faster for using logic & reason on SJWhoreier sites than any sort of bad language
- ofaodhagain
  
  Wow, this cunt totally just can’t even.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Yes. I’m all sevens and fives.
- Brononymous
  
  This is the level of discourse $100,000 in university education and 30 years of student loan debt buys the parents of Millennials.
  
  Yeah. Totally worth it.
- hamster_in_a_butt
  
  “Unattractive men, however, are welcome, as they constitute our audience”
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but toxic jackasses are always a vile sight to see.
    - Phil Carson
      
      So go away.
    - Brononymous
      
      Fat chicks with issues, however, never stop being hilarious.
    - Caploxion
      
      @NotActuallyHere “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”
      
      Bullshit. A butterfly, with its azure wings glistening in the sun is far more attractive than a slug in the mud. Similarly, a wide-eyed, wide-hipped, long-haired woman is far more attractive than a fat, short-haired, hairy-armpitted, skid-marked tramp of a woman.
  - Sgt P
    
    Yes. And you’re not invited to join them. Now go away.
ephena

“In addition, a section dedicated to take down SJWs in day-to-day life, in actuality and not just net, would be wonderful.”

How about you just give the FBI a heads up as to where you are going to be over the next couple of weeks. save them some time.
- 1stworlder
  
  Yea those affirmative action workers over at the IRS cant even find the emales of their top 9 affirmative action hires for the past 2 years.
NotActuallyHere

It’s amazing how many comments here have been deleted. Including one of mine.

How dare you take away my voice. This is supposed to be a safe spot for heterosexual men, which I am.
- Sara
  
  Men have balls tho..
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Not necessarily!
    - NotActuallyHere
      
      You know, in hindsight that “Not necessarily!” will probably be taken in an angry, hissy-fit tone when it’s meant in an energetic and peppy tone.
      
      Because seriously I am grinning from ear to ear here this place is fantastic.
    - 1stworlder
      
      The rabbit thinks having them in her mouth counts.
    - Travis
      
      Again. Case in point…
- Roosh_V
  
  I deleted two comments on the other post that were full of profanity. I don’t have time to babysit you people.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Fair enough.
Fopdespotic

Roosh, this site looks like ass. I think It would benefit from a better background, or some kind of differentiation between the fore and background. I like the idea, though, and I’ll be a consistent part of the community.
- Roosh_V
  
  We’re not even officially launched yet.
  - Fopdespotic
    
    And there’s already this many comments and shares? Damn, that SJW bump, though.
    - Roosh_V
      
      Yeah but it’s garbage traffic. Only good for lulz.
    - 1stworlder
      
      It could all just be one gay guy that got HIV on purpose to get social security disability, who then makes SJW his full time job at taxpayer expense with multiple accounts.
https://twitter.com/John_de_Vashon John Sage

“Criticism of women is not misogyny—it’s simply trying to make them the best versions of themselves”

Oooo… Full of yourself, much?

How big of you. I’m sure every woman on this planet needs your help to become “a better version of herself”.

What. An. Ass.

A condescending ass, at that. To put it very, very mildly.
- Titan000
  
  Asses and proud of it.
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Whelp. There ya go.
    - Titan000
      
      Ditto.
- Brononymous
  
  Yet, Sinfully-ugly feminists are quite happy to tell every man and woman exactly how they are supposed to behaviour to live acceptable lives.
  
  Hypocritical narcissists. I never thought I’d end up preferring the Religious Right to the Social Justice Left, but, yeah, life was better under their tyranny.
  - Kayla
    
    Yeah… because the “religious right” hasn’t been already doing that for hundreds of years to a far greater extent…
    - Travis
      
      Nah. About to the same extent. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. You’ve just managed to replace the old religion with a new secular one. But you punish heretics just as swiftly. Blasphemy will not be tolerated.
      - Sgt P
        
        There is a space in the human heart that can only be filled by religion. Christianity is out of style, the SJW religion is totes in right now.
    - 1stworlder
      
      Feel free to go to any Marxist nation. The real white supremacists are those risk life and limb to sneak into white nations to get on the dole/welfare.
    - Brononymous
      
      Classic female argument: “So? They did it too!”
      
      The right and left are interchangeable. You can either be considered a bad woman for not having children and wanting a career or a bad woman for not having a career and wanting children. You’re either obeying dominant men or dominant women who make you feel lesser and bully you into doing things their way.
      
      Either way, you’re a puppet on a string.
- 1stworlder
  
  Leftists don’t believe in objective reality, and reject every measurement of merit. People on the right want to be better, people on the left just want to vote for more free stuff paid for by taxes on the productive.
Harland

It is important not to confound Anti-Feminists with Misogynists, or women haters. Some of the early Church Fathers, John Knox, Schopenhauer and Strindberg, for instance, were Misogynists. They disliked and scorned women as such and found little to say in their favour. But men like Herbert Spencer, Nietzsche and myself are Anti-Feminists. We bear no hostility to women nor do we denigrate them gratuitously. We merely assail and resist that Movement which has endured with more or less prominence and success ever since Hellenic days, and has aimed at driving women from domesticity and the home into industry, public life and, in fact, every male sphere.

Anti-Feminism differs from Misogyny in that, while the former is friendly to normal women, the latter attacks all women. Anti-Feminists see in Feminism a conspiracy against the normally functioning woman; a Movement favourable to a minority of masculinoid females ill-endowed for motherhood, and tending to lure women favourably endowed for motherhood along paths where their psycho-physical needs cannot be satisfied.

— Anthony M. Ludovici, “Enemies of Women”, http://www.anthonymludovici.com/ew_int.htm
- Vanir
  
  Wow. That dude certainly was full of bull. If you hate women who won’t live exactly as you think they should and act exactly like you want them to – then yes, you hate women in general.
  - Travis
    
    So then obviously it would be safe to say that you hate men, right?
    - Vanir
      
      nope. got no problem with most men. but i hate men that DO want women to be weak and submissive – and who think of women primarily as sources of pleasure / comfort / laundry service / reproduction vats
      
      why wouldn’t i?
      who wouldn’t hate someone who want other people to be their weak little servants?
      - Sgt P
        
        Women are weak and dependent. That is a fact of nature and it is not men’s fault. Nature made them that way. Speaking that out loud is not hatred of women, it is love of nature and humanity. Censoring the natural fact is hatred of nature and hatred of humanity.
      - Travis
        
        But you said that “if you hate women who won’t live exactly as you think they should and act exactly like you want them to- then yes, you hate women in general.”
        So why doesn’t the reverse apply to you? If you hate men who won’t live exactly as you think they should, and act exactly like you want them to (the men on this site for instance)- then yes, you hate men in general.
        
        Can you tell me why that’s any different?
      - Vanir
        
        it’s different because men in general (at least here in the west) do NOT want women to be weak and submissive (just as women themselves don’t want to BE weak little half-humans).
        and just so you know – if men in general did want women to be their pathetic little housebound servants, then yes, i would hate them – any women not utterly self-loathing would hate them – and rightly so! why should they not?
      - Travis
        
        But that’s not what you said. You said that “If you hate women who won’t live exactly as you think they should and
        act exactly like you want them to – then yes, you hate women in general.”
        
        And since you obviously hate men who won’t live exactly as you think they should, and act exactly like you want them to, then unless you’re a complete hypocrite, it follows that “yes- you hate men in general.”
      - Vanir
        
        it’s a numbers thing.
        most women don’t want to be weak, therefore hating strong women means hating most women (women in general)
        most men also don’t want women weak, hating men who want weak women, therefore means only hating a relatively small number of men (NOT men in general)
        
        though i should have made this more clear:
        it’s that if you hate women who don’t want to live *specifically* as RoK types wants them to live.
        then you DO end up hating women in general.
        while hating the RoK type of men, do not mean hating men in general. thankfully. (though again,
        if most men thought like that – hating them would be quite righteous).
      - Brononymous
        
        If most men ‘don’t want women weak’, then why are feminist writers constantly complaining on Slate, HuffPo and Jezebel about men’s ‘fragile egos’ and not wanting to date women because they’re ‘intimidated by their intelligence?’ Shouldn’t they be swamped with eligible, attractive suitors?
        
        Why do feminists expect heterosexual men to be attracted to women who embody masculinity? You’re basically-expecting straight men to want a gay relationship?
      - Vanir
        
        strength and free spirit being only “masculine” qualities that only men should naturally have, is your invention – not reality. women are obviously capable of such traits, at least to such a degree that those who want women to be pathetic doormats find it a problem
        and yes. many men have too fragile egos that for some reason threatened by women being intelligent and capable (but again, if women were NOT naturally capable of this, there would be no problem for these men). but there is a distance from there to actually wanting women as a whole to be subservient weaklings
hamster_in_a_butt

As a shitty, horrible man, I am overjoyed there is finally a gam site for me.
- JacobDeadMan
  
  >gam
  
  I am happy too. Hue.
  - hamster_in_a_butt
    
    Please don’t make fun of my grammar. Everything I do is trash. That is why I am glad there is this gam site for me.
    - Phil Carson
      
      Keep reading. Keep clicking. Keep visiting. Thank you for the support!
Tom

As a heterosexual male, I can comfortably say this sounds like the opposite of a safe place for me. The ideas you’re spouting are uninformed, alarmist and generally appalling.
- AnnPelham
  
  A white knight? #totallynotsurprised
  
  —
  
  “The ideas you’re sprouting are uninformed, alarmist and generally appalling.”
  
  Such as?
- Roosh_V
  
  Understood, goodbye forever.
tickletik

Great site
John Galt

Sheesh. Where did all these angry chicks are snarky leftoids come from? How did they all get here so fast?
- NotActuallyHere
  
  We are attracted to the scent of tears.
  - John Galt
    
    How edgy of you. Male tears?
    
    http://i0.wp.com/www.avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/08/val.jpg?resize=564%2C562
    - NotActuallyHere
      
      Nah. I don’t discriminate on that front. Plenty of women are jackasses too.
      - Travis
        
        Case in point…
    - NotActuallyHere
      
      JESUS FUCKING CHRIST DUDE THAT WAS A BROKEN IMAGE BEFORE WHAT THE FUCK
      
      ARE YOU ACTUALLY TRYING TO USE THE HORRIFIC SUFFERING OF REAL MEN TO WIN AN INTERNET ARGUMENT ABOUT HOW FEMINISTS MAKE FUN OF MEN WHO WHINE ABOUT THEIR BEING TOO MANY WOMEN IN AN ALREADY MALE-DOMINATED MEDIA FORMAT!?
      
      THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU.
      
      FUCK YOU AND YOUR WHOLE FUCKING MOVEMENT.
      - John Galt
        
        The feigned shock, caps lock and profanity really sells the outrage.
        
        JESUSFUCKINGCHRIST!!
        
        READABOOKDOUCHECANOE!!
        
        WOWJUSTWOW!!
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Fuck you.
        
        No. Seriously. Fuck you.
        
        I thought you where just another deranged manchild but you are obviously someone very toxic.
        
        I pity anyone who has ever met you.
        
        Fuck.
        
        You.
      - John Galt
        
        Heh angry SJW’s. When the over exaggerated and oddly out of place swear words and emotion doesn’t work…..Ramp it up a notch!!
        
        “”I PITY ANYONE WHO HAS EVER MET YOU !!””
        
        Not just someone but ANYONE who has ever met me.
      - http://conservativenewswire.wordpress.com/ Conservative Newswire
        
        You have to understand, MRAs don’t feel any emotions when they look at those images. So passing them around and comparing some men’s actual suffering to themselves constantly losing internet arguments makes sense.
      - Brononymous
        
        So, it’s like how SJW’s take a minor ego injury a high-resilient person would shrug off and turn in into an important human rights issue?
      - כשכשכשכשכלוילוילוילו
        
        “someone said they don’t believe in gay marriage, we’d better ruin their reputation and force them to resign!” – equality in action
      - Phil Carson
        
        So angry! So upset! So offended! RAWR!!
      - Brononymous
        
        You.
        Know.
        It’s. Totes.
        Serious.
        when com
        ments
        
        start becom
        ing
        an e.e. Cummings
        Poem.
      - Brononymous
        
        Gather ’round kids… This is textbook narcissistic injury / fury.
        
        p.s. You sound fat.
      - 1stworlder
        
        Zoe Quinn was only willing to do a dozen guys for profit.
- JacobDeadMan
  
  They are like the Borg.
  - TheWastelander
    
    I never saw a fat Borg before.
    - JacobDeadMan
      
      Hue. Top kek.
- 1stworlder
  
  One gay guy that got HIV on purpose for social security disability has being a SJW as a full time job paid for by your taxes, using multiple accounts.
JacobDeadMan

The best thing about this is that SJWs are gonna advertise this site for free. They’ll blow it up, and we’ll get more traffic. Hue.
MercuryPixel

Thank you so much for this website Roosh.

Now it’s gonna be easier to tell people what Gamergate is all about. “Just go to their website and see the first editorial piece”.

Again, thank you so much.

Just one suggestion, this website should be called “last nail in the coffin”, because seriously, you can’t say this trainwreck of a movement is about ethics, journalism, consumer revolt or whatever when you start with this nonsense.

Oh, but kudos to you for not saying “this site is for straight, white males”. That’s freaking progress right there!!!… by Gamergate’s standards, of course.

Anyway, I wish you the best, maybe the MRAs and MRAs in the making are finally gonna leave other websites trashing everyone with progressive ideas.

One more time: THANK YOU FOR THIS WEBSITE!.
- John Galt
  
  Was that a Freudian slip? Where did he say “white males”?
  - NotActuallyHere
    
    Well that’s what “Western Men” tends to be synonymous with.
    
    Someone using the term is usually…
    
    Well. Someone like Roosh.
    - John Galt
      
      So what is it you’re actually upset over? Western men or white men?
      - MercuryPixel
        
        Dude, I didn’t say he said that! XD
        
        Read the comment again, Jesus Freaking Christ on a stick!.
      - John Galt
        
        I’m still not following. Why would he even say “white males”? You’re making it out as if he was bursting to say it. As in he just stopped short. What makes you say that?
      - MercuryPixel
        
        Go to wikipedia and search for this word: “joke”.
        
        Learn the definition, and then come back and we’ll discuss things, ok?.
      - John Galt
        
        joke
        
        dʒəʊk/
        noun
        1.
        a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
        
        I’m sure it will sink in later.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        You are a very confused young child.
      - MercuryPixel
        
        He’s delusional. Like your regular gater.
      - Brononymous
        
        Do you really think you’re the first generation that has identified all the problems in the world and will be the ones to fix them, for once and for all, my naïve little twit?
      - 1stworlder
        
        She probably thinks that if someone just sent some books over to Africa they would all be literate in a decade.
      - Travis
        
        Funny. That’s what I’d say about a white man who obviously hates white men.
    - Travis
      
      You mean someone with a Middle Eastern background? Hate to break it to you, but you’re probably more white than Roosh. Uh oh. Guess that means that he’s a better person than you!
    - 1stworlder
      
      Western is civilization I can understand why you don’t think it applies to non Asian minorities. Mexican President Calderon said “where there is Mexicans there is Mexico” if you compare littering, crime, drug use, and Mexico’s 12yo age of consent you will see he is right.
  - MercuryPixel
    
    “kudos to you for not saying “this site is for straight, white males”.
    
    That was… my point.
    
    I didn’t say he did. Please read it again.
    - John Galt
      
      You just said:
      
      “Oh, but kudos to you for not saying “this site is for straight, white males”.”
      
      I’m quoting you. Again where does he say “white”?
      - MercuryPixel
        
        Oh my…
        
        Kudos to you for NOT SAYING…
        
        NOT SAYING! NOT SAYING! XD Hehehe.
      - NotActuallyHere
        
        Please retake reading comprehension 101.
  - 1stworlder
    
    The left considers Asians to be white because they evolved under the same conditions as whites having to build/plan/store to survive winters with no food growing that they have white privilege for everything except short distance runs also.
- 1stworlder
  
  You hate that white & Asian(count as white for SJW) are the only people that ever achieved civilization so much that you throw white in there.
- theliberatorofbados
  
  Yes, because Gamergate has been “dead” now for weeks on end and now months, so surely THIS will be the nail in the coffin now!
  
  The party is over. Politcos are not going to be shitting up our (both men and women) hobby with their divisiveness any longer. The “gaming press” won’t stand up for gamers, so gamers have stopped patronizing them. And now you’re seeing the next step: We’re building websites so we no longer have to suffer from your intolerance and incoherence. All we want to talk about is games and have fun. If you wanna partake in that, then we welcome you with open arms. Try to 2+2=5 in here and we’ll mock, ridicule, or just simply ignore you.
Yazata Anahita

Roosh, I hope you cover fighting games, the FGC has been accused of sexism for quite some time since banal eSports tried to take over.
http://schellerscreen.com/ schellerscreen

Cool. Let’s see how this goes.

Cheers!
Charlie Alcock

Jesus wept.
- Brononymous
  
  Leftists taught me Jesus didn’t exist, and if he did, he’s a privileged white male, so we should drink his tears.
  - Charlie Alcock
    
    Do you think you’re being funny or…?
- 1stworlder
  
  After he got thrown in jail for stealing hubcaps.
Iamnotmyself

“I have no grand plan for Reaxxion. The direction of the site will be
determined by the team of writers I’ve assembled and the submissions you
send us.” How much do you pay for these author submissions you intend to profit from? Didn’t see it on your ethics page.
- Iamnotmyself
  
  Apologies. Found it.
  
  “Do I get paid for my submission?
  
  No, only our weekly columnists receive compensation for their writing.”
Abaleth

GamerGaters! At last, someone who truly understands you! Or is the message something else?
Charlie Alcock

Complaining about pushing agendas and them putting a gigantic plug for your bullshit extremist website on the homepage? The hypocrisy here is astounding.
- Montgomery Draxel
  
  Please tell your ladies in waiting how outraged you are.
  
  PS: Cool Fedora sir.
  - Charlie Alcock
    
    10/10, you really owned me good, montgomery draxel. my ladies in waiting are awed by your sparkling wit and wish to throw themselves upon your virile member immediately
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  hi faggot. This site is for NOT pussyfied man where we enjoy games, tits in games, rape of SJWs in games and violence in games! Now fuck off and get your daily dose of strapon!
  - Matthew 6:5
    
    Says the PHAG!
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      wuhu… you hit me hard now matthew… brother matthew… or should i say sister matthew instead ?
- 1stworlder
  
  When you are done crying you can make a better site. That’s what straight white males do when they don’t like something.
- Matthew 6:5
  
  Well the crowd here is pathetic loser virgins! He’s just marketing!
- T and A man
  
  Charlie No-cock
  
  #rekt
sadlysadlysadly

The most amazing irony of Roosh Valizadeh is that he claims to attract and manipulate women but devotes all of his time and energy (and rightfully so, it’s his livelihood) to perfecting the art of attracting and manipulating men. He’s gotten pretty good at wooing a certain kind of guy, and he’s hoping GamerGate is full of them.
- MikeyArmstrong
  
  He’s a master at seducing gullible, angry geeks. Women? Not so much.
  - Travis
    
    “He’s a master at seducing gullible, angry geeks.”
    
    Exactly! Excellent point. Look at all the white knight SJW’s that have shown up for his grand opening…
- Sgt P
  
  Game is game, whether it’s on women, men, bosses, subordinates, or car salesmen.
  - sadlysadlysadly
    
    and he’s devoted his whole life to using it on lonely young men for some reason?
Bachmann Corndog Overdrive

“Hello, my name is Roosh.” Hahaha somehow I doubt that. Nice website Norman.
- 1stworlder
  
  He is middle eastern they have odd names like Cassabian. Check your normal name privilege.
Freddy

sweet corded telephone bro
Booch Paradise

I’m normally all about open comments, but if this is not going to be a place for winning converts so much as a place for those already pro #gamergate, it might make sense.
Guest

Lol because this helps the cause
Guest

Lol
Kayla

Lol because this helps your cause
- Montgomery Draxel
  
  Hi Kayla Roskopf !
  
  Got any sexy Cosplay pics to share? Something where you keep it tucked, though. Don’t need to see your tranny nutsack this early in the AM.
  - Kayla
    
    And this is what you have to contribute
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      ———————> door!
      - Matthew 6:5
        
        No Thanks!
  - Matthew 6:5
    
    ^ CLOSETED PHAG!
Montgomery Draxel

This website: http://rack.2.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDEyLzEyLzA0LzMwL2FyZXlvdWZhbGxpLmI1RS5qcGcKcAl0aHVtYgk5NTB4NTM0IwplCWpwZw/f94137f9/f17/are-you-falling-into-the-pricing-trap–72787acf29.jpg

Well done. All the concern trolls and SJW driving hits. Well done Roosh, well done.
- http://thenewversailles.wordpress.com Robert Baratheon
  
  The SJWs will become frustrated outside their hugboxes and echochambers in a few days once they run out of juvenile insults and depart as they always do, but the publicity they generate for the site will last long after they’ve retreated. Couldn’t be more thankful to them.
  - Sgt P
    
    It is true. They get winded after a few days of furor and retreat. They don’t come back until we’ve really expertly trolled them again and make them scurry on over.
Grim the Reaper

Good on you, Roosh! This is an awesome idea!
CR7

What feminists and SJW don’t understand is that gamers just want to be left alone, to play their games in peace. Seriously, just let us be and go preach your ideology somewhere else.
- 1stworlder
  
  The whole point of the long march through the institutions is conformity to their message everywhere.
Thomas Fährmann

I will enjoy this place like i enjoy ROK. I´m so sick of the bitches and their self centered idiocy that isnt about the games but there personal melt downs they make public. I´m working on an inquisition mod where you have to deal with medieval feminazis or so called witches. Its a honestly war and violent but you will see how the inquisitioners were right in many cases. At least in my mod 😉
- Matthew 6:5
  
  ^ Virgin!
  - Travis
    
    ^Guy who doesn’t have the ability or intelligence to form a coherent argument, and resorts to childish name calling and insults in a pathetic attempt to shame into silence anyone who says something he disagrees with!
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      yeah. Mathew is showing his mad skillz… 😀
  - Thomas Fährmann
    
    yes i´m a virgin in regards to murder, everything else… not your business 😉
http://masculineepic.blogspot.com/ Libertas

Excellent way to start this place off. You’ll most likely find me commenting here on my alt account: Never_SAG. I think I’m going to enjoy the flamewars of butthurt Cultural Marxists as much as on ROK or perhaps even more, considering that they can’t so much as let a simple little hobby like video games escape their gaze.
Erik Lodge

Not a huge fan of the name. Reaxxion sounds so… reactive. Why not choose something that captures gaming or the values of men expressing themselves freely, vs simply a reaction to #gamergate?
- Roosh_V
  
  You are free to start a gaming web site with any name you desire.
Matthew 6:5

roosh = DOUCHE
- Travis
  
  Wow. Good one, dude. Did your fourth grader nephew help you come up with that?
  - Matthew 6:5
    
    Thanks!
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      and who are you ?
      - Matthew 6:5
        
        Not an A S S H O LE like you!
      - Thomas Fährmann
        
        I would use you as a floor mob to clean my basement so yes i´m an asshole and proud of it 😉
Oliver Pereira

“We won’t exclude homosexuals or attractive women from commenting on our articles”. WTF? Did you *really* just write that? Are you saying that you’re okay with excluding women if you happen not to find them attractive? Because that’s what it sounds like.
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  I´m ok with that. There are enough sites out there who supports these fat meat pigs who cant control their zombie like appetite for candy. Every wymin with colored hair, weirdo glasses and the special feminist gaze is not welcome here i think….
  - Oliver Pereira
    
    Okay, Mr. Fährmann, so you’re a horrible, woman-hating bigot. Thank you for letting me know.
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      By your pseudo “intellectualls” i´m a mysogonistic ass of bigtry and a very dangerous dude by night. Thank you for the medal of honour, it´s appreciated
      btw. I´m sure i fucked more wymin then you and they never said that i was “horrible”. Mabye you project your own failures to much into other people…
      - Oliver Pereira
        
        Bloody hell. I might as well have wandered onto a neo-Nazi site. I’d get just as much sense there.
      - Thomas Fährmann
        
        you dont even know what a true neo-nazi is little sister…
- Kirijo
  
  Freedom of association/disassociation is a wonderful thing.
  - Oliver Pereira
    
    Freedom of association is great. Excluding people on the basis of their sex or their physical appearance or some combination of both is appalling. I suppose you’d be fine with someone saying, “No comments from black people,” would you?
    - Thomas Fährmann
      
      yes. We exclude everything on this god damn planet that is not with the REICH. Eric Cartman is our Fuhrer forever!
    - Kirijo
      
      Yes, I would be. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with people associating with just their kin if they choose so.
- Roosh_V
  
  “Are you saying that you’re okay with excluding women if you happen not to find them attractive?”
  
  Is English not your first language or do you want me to write as if you were a first grader?
  - Oliver Pereira
    
    I would like you to write as if you could give a sensible answer to my question.
Matthew 6:5

So is this a pick up site for anti-social LOSERS?
Truth Seeker

Why does your site’s manifesto implicitly encourage harassment, in direct violation of clause 5 of your own ethics policy?
– “we strongly believe […] women should be feminine […] make them the best versions of themselves”
– “won’t exclude homosexuals or attractive women”
– “truth, a value that is opposed by those”
– “white knights, man-haters, and SJW’s”

“Should be”, “make”, “attractive”, othering, coded name-calling … These are terms, qualifiers, projections, and messaging tactics that have historically been used to encourage and justify harassment of targeted groups.
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  I as an individuall and a phenomenon of free will and self thought say i encourage the stoning of feminazis and i have no problem with the history of the dominican order at all anymore. Hail the patriarchy and the whipping of teh evil witches
- Roosh_V
  
  You have violated our safe space with SJW delusional language. Banned.
Linda M

I don’t understand why straight guys feel so threatened by homosexuality. Gay men are your natural allies. They are not interested in women, they don’t like when women show up to have bachelorette parties at the gay bar, and masculinity is openly celebrated…

The Perez Hilton’s of the world are no more representative of gay men than Tucker Max represents straight guys.
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  You are not up-to-date. You should check your twitter privilege!
- 1stworlder
  
  Imagine a straight guy could sneak into your restroom and check out your stuff. Oh wait leftists made that legal in some states. Women don’t even like women you cant get a group of more than 5 that are not being catty against each other.
  - Just asking
    
    It seems like you’re implying something about restrooms, but I’m unclear on what it is, other than that you don’t like gay men checking out your junk. Where should a gay man go if he needs to pee? And if they have different rules than straight men, how do we verify that people are doing the right thing?
    - 1stworlder
      
      I’ll be coming into your bathroom. I will say I am a handicapped transracial diesel lesbian drag king trapped in an able mans body.
Shit Lord

The fact this site pisses off the SJWs so much tells me a lot. Women are allowed to have their spaces, but when men do it, holy fuck, it must be destroyed.
- Matthew 6:5
  
  Not really!
  - Shit Lord
    
    Yas really!
Shit Lord

Try being a man with a real opinion on polygon and see how fast you get banned. Gaming sites have been taken over by SJWs and the fact this site exists tells me how much the infestation has taken over.

The fact it has taken Roosh V, a non gamer, to create a site like this should make you SJWs look at your selves.
- Matthew 6:5
  
  Virgin?
  - Travis
    
    Don’t look now, Shit Lord, but I think Matthew is looking for someone to bond over shared life experiences with…
  - Jason Jones
    
    Gotta love that SJW logic. Like someone’s opinion on the right to free speech has anything to do with often they get laid. I would also love to see the SJW’s apply this same standard to women when they give opinions. There would definitely be some slut shaming going on lol.
  - Shit Lord
    
    Faggot?
cesar

You are not a “Western man”.You are a sand n888r, don’t forget this.
Right sector in Ukraine won’t miss that neither.
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  … no real ukraine guy would write sand n….. you know. Maybe you dont know what you are talking about.. but hey. Asov or Aidar is not an issue of gaming dude…
  I guess you dont even know anything about what is going on there…in reality 😉
- Kirijo
  
  Right Sector are only good at being useful idiots for both Putin’s government and the pro-western Ukrainian oligarchs.
Roger Daily

Nice job on the bannings. Their unkind words made me feel unsafe, just like waiting on the results of a HIV test after banging Lacy Green might make me feel unsafe.
http://atheism-analyzed.blogspot.com Stan

I have started a site called Analyzing Leftism, which will address the issues of Leftist Social Justice, the new tolerance/intolerance, the new equality of outcome promoted by those who claim the moral authority to dictate moral behaviors to all others. They form a Messiah Class, which necessitates a Victimhood Class and an Oppressor Class. Their class warfare constitutes much if not all of the “Progressive” movement.

Please check it out; it is counter warfare and needs support.
theliberatorofbados

I’m not sure how this will go, but I’m glad you’re doing this, Roosh. Despite the trolls/SJWs here, I think a site like this could grow when it’s stated explicitly that pushing political agendas won’t be tolerated in the reviews, or from the staff.

Trust has been permanently lost on the part of the old gaming journalists, sites like this can definitely fill the void they have left in their wake.
Carpenter E

Excellent idea, Roosh! Bookmarked and I’ll be sure to read more.
- Carpenter E
  
  Laughing at Vanir’s comment down-thread that Roosh wants to “regress us back to ape-stage”. Right before that he had written another comment that Roosh wants us “back to the Dark Ages”. That’s a very quick jump of tens of thousands of years with just a few minutes in between posts. I guess his feelings needed the extra hyperbole to be stilled.
Random Reader

Best wishes to the new site Rooosh!!!

Maybe the SJW neo-Taliban will get so upset their heads will explode.
Lily

Fuck this website and anyone who supports gamergate
sencillo

Gamers and geeks are standing up for masculinity? These are the days of miracle and wonder!
David Flory

No man should ever use the term “safe space” un-ironically.
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  When i want my save space in real life i can make that very clear. But when i´m online i dont want a faggot or SJW talking to me from the sides because i´m not able to tell him fuck off or he/ she gets some. So this site is precious to me!
  This save space means you dont have to deal with cowardly faggots that only make their point behing the screen. If you take a good look at the most prominent social santa claus idiots you can see how manly they are. So why waste energy with them when we can just ban them here because you know they would never insult you outthere when it means consequence!
  In reallife when one of those idiots start to argue with you it means boom after a warning and thats it! Pretty simple and always works.
Jim

Roosh V, did you delete comments where you asked women to send pictures to you so you could decide if they were attractive? How brave of you.
whatareyouevenijustcant

“Hey gamers, I am not one of you. I have created a site for you to talk
about your topic I am not interested in but is the zeitgeist and might
generate ad revenue and hopefully direct just the kind of insecure young
lonely men I AM interested in to my site! I made sure not to spend more
than 30 minutes ginning up a horrible template so I can’t really lose on this one. thxbye”
In it for the games

Roosh V I am a gamer and have been since I was 4 in the early 90’s (C64 FTW). My skills at writing articles are bad, hell pretty pathetic to be honest or I would submit one. Still I was hoping we might get an article that looks at games old and new and the good things and bad eg. Story, level design and mechanics. A good example of my biggest peeve being why the fuck was Red Faction pretty much the only game to go for full on destroyable enviroments? Or what some old games did great that could be brought into new games. And things in new and old games that need improvement or to be tossed out like the crap it is (I am looking at you micro transactions and useless DLC) maybe even a discussion on the whole day 1 patching which in my mind just screams unfinished game. I hope this site becomes a true game site that has honest reviews, insightful content on what makes certain games iconic and why Porting favors console to PC but rarely the other way round. I am really hoping to finally find a place not bent over the table by big companies and their marketing manipulation, I am sure a few reviewers have received “gifts” from big companies to make sure Clone of Duty 85.3 gets a minimum of 9/10 stars and I dont give 2 shits about genitals I just want honest reviews and retrospectives not the sucking up we all see on mainstream game sites. Apologies to COD fans but I had to pick a trip A title with a fair few sequels and it fit the bill.
- https://twitter.com/TheEnclaveIsYou John H. Eden
  
  Your writing is pretty good. Just separate your paragraphs instead of using a big block of text.
Crisis Knight

Ahh yes, the internet is still the internet. Crisis Knight Reporting in! ProGG as fuck
Dan_Cayse

It is a woman’s place to obey men. This has been confirmed by biology and all the other sciences, as well as the Bible. I don’t know what other proof anyone should need.
Terry “The Invader” Xu

Shit Roosh, I had this exact idea of making a gaming version of RoK

Beat me to it.

Suggestion: More anti-feminist articles, less generic gaming articles. Those are everywhere, and the controversy will make your traffic skyrocket
- Thomas Fährmann
  
  And articles about games those feminazis get upset about. Sexy curves and good looking pixel woman are an example those Dworkinian hate with a passion. Think about a game these people would love to be made ? A game with a protagonist that has this special Dworkinian “beauty” and the intelligencia of a sarkessian schoolar… the fat hairy female ogre (or troll) with a brain big as a crippled bean and her speech goes like this… mohm ungdu nom nom ohm babushdu ugu uk!
Paul

misogynist
a man who is winning an argument against a woman.

PLEASE VOTE!!!
http://misogynist.urbanup.com/7954396
Edward Voeller

This is a great idea. I stand behind you.
Pingback: ROK Now Has A Little Brother: Reaxxion.com()
Pingback: What you can do, part 2 | Vox Popoli()
Pingback: I Started A New Web Site: Reaxxion.com()
Pingback: Top 10 Cringeworthy Pictures That Signal The Decline Of The GDC | MGTOW 2.0()

Don't Miss Reaxxion's Best Articles!

Every Monday we send an email that recaps the week. Enter your first name and email below to make sure you don't miss out...

We guarantee 100% privacy
Your information will not be shared

Roosh Valizadeh

Roosh is publisher of Reaxxion. He created it to provide a space for masculine men who play video games. You can follow him on Twitter.

November 10, 2014 Meta

Welcome To Reaxxion A gaming site for those who support #gamergate

Roosh Valizadeh

I’m not a gamer

Have you heard of Return Of Kings?

Reaxxion’s goal

We are the reaction to #gamergate

More From Reaxxion

Don't Miss Reaxxion's Best Articles!

Roosh Valizadeh

Amazing Email Newsletter

Recent Posts

Newest Articles From Return Of Kings

Newest Articles From Roosh

Latest Forum Threads

Welcome To Reaxxion A gaming site for those who support #gamergate

Roosh Valizadeh

I’m not a gamer

Have you heard of Return Of Kings?

Reaxxion’s goal

We are the reaction to #gamergate

More From Reaxxion

Don't Miss Reaxxion's Best Articles!

Roosh Valizadeh

Top 5 Posts Of The Week

Amazing Email Newsletter

Recent Posts